Application of environmental, social and governance practices in agriculture
Abstract
The purpose of the study was to conduct a comparative analysis of the features of applying Environmental, Social, Governance practices to ensure sustainable development of the agricultural sector in Sweden, the Netherlands, Germany, and the Kyrgyz Republic. The comparison was conducted using the metrics of the International Financial Reporting Standards and the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board. It was found that Sweden has the highest standards in the European Union for the use of renewable energy and social equity, the Netherlands leads the sector in the use of circular economy, and Germany is a model of efficient use of renewable energy in various sectors of the economy. These achievements have been made possible by the countries’ engagement in cross-border cooperation aimed at equitable and fair distribution of funds, attracting young professionals and promoting innovation in the agricultural sector. These initiatives contribute to the gradual transition to organic agriculture, the share of which in the member countries of the Union will be increased to 30% by 2030. In contrast to the above countries, the Kyrgyz Republic is at the very beginning of the path to managing the agricultural sector taking into account Environmental, Social, Governance-standards. The country's development on this path is hampered by insufficient economic, human, and information resources necessary for the transition from extensive to intensive agriculture. Development will be facilitated by the country's participation in international projects aimed at introducing Environmental, Social and Governance practices in the agricultural sector, attracting young specialists and supporting innovation processes at the national and regional levels. Wide implementation of Environmental, Social, Governance-principles can be used for the development of the agricultural sector of the Kyrgyz Republic, which is the subject of this study
Keywords
sustainable development; economic development; social development; environmental development; transboundary cooperation; innovations
[1] 585 additional organic farms since 2015. (2022). Retrieved from https://www.cbs.nl/en-gb/news/2022/43/585additional-organic-farms-since-2015.
[2] Bezerra, R.R., Martins, V.W.B., & Macedo, A.N. (2024). Validation of challenges for implementing ESG in construction considering the context of an emerging economy country. Applied Sciences, 14(14), article number 6024. doi: 10.3390/app14146024.
[3] Bilal, M., & Jaghdani, T.J. (2024). Barriers to the adoption of multiple agricultural innovations: Insights from Bt cotton, wheat seeds, herbicides and no-tillage in Pakistan. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 22(1), article number 2318934. doi: 10.1080/14735903.2024.2318934.
[4] Cao, J., & Solangi, Y.A. (2023). Analyzing and prioritizing the barriers and solutions of sustainable agriculture for promoting sustainable development goals in China. Sustainability, 15(10), article number 8317. doi: 10.3390/ su15108317.
[5] Chen, Y., & Li, Y. (2024). Institutional investors’ distraction and audit fees: The mediating effect of ESG rating disagreement. Scientific Bulletin of Mukachevo State University. Series “Economics”, 11(2), 102-115. doi: 10.52566/ msu-econ2.2024.102.
[6] De La Llave, A.N., Monroy, H.C., & Castrejón, Y.D.P. (2022). Analysis of the relationship between the establishment of Community Based-Tourism and multidimensional poverty reduction in rural households. Journal of Tourism Analysis, 29(2), 1-40. doi: 10.53596/jta.v29i2.417.
[7] Eurostat. (2024). Developments in organic farming. Retrieved from http://surl.li/nsoqeh.
[8] Fetzer, I., & Hall, M. (2024). Meet the FABLE Sweden team. Retrieved from https://fableconsortium.org/sweden/.
[9] Germany – CAP strategic plan. (2024). Retrieved from http://surl.li/cxzdiv.
[10] Global Finance: Kyrgyz Republic. (2024). Retrieved from http://surl.li/oajyio.
[11] Hakelius, K., & Nilsson, J. (2020). The logic behind the internal governance of Sweden’s largest agricultural cooperatives. Sustainability, 12(21), article number 9073. doi: 10.3390/su12219073.
[12] Hazbi, F.E., & Mounir, Y. (2023). Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) practices and environmental performance: The mediation role of technology innovation. E3S Web of Conferences, 412, article number 01009. doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202341201009.
[13] Hossain, D.M. (2023). Environmental, social and governance (ESG) reporting: An overview. doi: 10.13140/ RG.2.2.25447.83364.
[14] Islam, M.H., Anam, M.Z., Hoque, M.R., Nishat, M., & Bari, A.M. (2024). Agriculture 4.0 adoption challenges in the emerging economies: Implications for smart farming and sustainability. Journal of Economy and Technology, 2, 278-295. doi: 10.1016/j.ject.2024.09.002.
[15] Kadyraliev, A., Oruntayeva, A., Kamchybekov, T., Abyshov, I., & Bigali, A. (2024). The impact of digital technologies on the effectiveness of management in the agricultural sector of the Kyrgyz Republic. Ekonomika APK, 31(5), 35-44. doi: 10.32317/ekon.apk/5.2024.35.
[16] Kalogiannidis, S., Karafolas, S., & Chatzitheodoridis, F. (2024). The key role of cooperatives in sustainable agriculture and agrifood security: Evidence from Greece. Sustainability, 16(16), article number 7202. doi: 10.3390/su16167202.
[17] Khoerunnisa, R., & Maulana, Z. (2023). Para diplomacy through Sister City Cooperation: Efforts to increase the potential of the agricultural sector in Karawang District. E3S Web of Conferences, 444, article number 02045. doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202344402045.
[18] Koç, A.A., Bayaner, A., & Koç, G. (2024). Agri-food policy trends and state of sustainable food system in Türkiye. New Medit, 3, 17-36. doi: 10.30682/nm2403b.
[19] Kuhnert, H. (2024). Organic farming in figures. Retrieved from https://www.thuenen.de/en/thuenen-topics/ organic-farming/aktuelle-trends-der-deutschen-oekobranche/oekolandbau-in-zahlen.
[20] Lew, G., Zyczynski, N., Olejarz, T., & Pomykala, M. (2024). The importance of CSR and ESG in shaping competitive and image advantage of enterprises. European Research Science Journal, XXVII(3), 308-323. doi: 10.35808/ ersj/3436.
[21] Liou, J.J.H., Liu, P.Y.L., & Huang, S.W. (2023). Exploring the key barriers to ESG adoption in enterprises. Systems and Soft Computing, 5, article number 200066. doi: 10.1016/j.sasc.2023.200066.
[22] Malau, A.G., Malau, A.G., & Simanjuntak, M.B. (2024). Innovating sustainable agriculture: Perspectives from economy and biology professionals. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia, 10(1), 320-328. doi: 10.22219/jpbi. v10i1.32587.
[23] Mukambaeva, I.B., Akylbekova, N.I., Mukambaev, N.J., Lailieva, E.J., & Nam, I.E. (2024). Comparing the agricultural sectors of the EAEU countries through the sustainability index. Advances in Science, Technology and Innovation, Part F2356, 431-435. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-49711-7_71.
[24] Netherlands – CAP strategic plan. (2024). Retrieved from https://agriculture.ec.europa.eu/cap-my-country/ cap-strategic-plans/netherlands_en.
[25] Nilsson, J. (2022). Agricultural cooperative development and institutional change: Swedish examples from 1990 to 2020. International Journal of Food System Dynamics, 13(2), 115-127. doi: 10.18461/ijfsd.v13i2.B1.
[26] OECD environmental performance reviews: Germany 2023. (2023). Retrieved from http://surl.li/oqlmxl.
[27] Ogryzek, M. (2022). The sustainable development paradigm. Geomatics and Environmental Engineering, 17(1), 5-18. doi: 10.7494/geom.2023.17.1.5.
[28] Omurgazieva, N., Tilekeeva, B., Bekkozhaeva, A., Chanachev, N., & Cholponkulov, T. (2024). Impact of tax policy on the development of agrarian enterprises and organisations. Ekonomika APK, 31(3), 34-44. doi: 10.32317/22211055.2024030.34.
[29] Pechlivani, E.M., Gkogkos, G., Giakoumoglou, N., Hadjigeorgiou, I., & Tzovaras, D. (2023). Towards sustainable engineering: A robust decision support system’s architecture for Agriculture 4.0. In 2023 24th International conference on digital signal processing (pp. 1-5). Rhodes: IEEE. doi: 10.1109/DSP58604.2023.10167922.
[30] Robinson, G.M. (2024). Global sustainable agriculture and land management systems. Geography and Sustainability, 5(4), 637-646. doi: 10.1016/j.geosus.2024.09.001.
[31] Sagynalieva, M. (2024). Organic agriculture in Kyrgyzstan as a symbol of ecological modernization. Central Asian Bureau for Analytical Reporting. Retrieved from https://cabar.asia/en/organic-agriculture-in-kyrgyzstanas-a-symbol-of-ecological-modernization.
[32] Sahoo, A.K., Behera, H.C., & Behura, A.K. (2021). Philosophy of sustainable development: Understanding public health. Environment Development and Sustainability, 24(12), 12248-12262. doi: 10.1007/s10668-021-01945-5.
[33] Saparova, G., Khan, G.D., & Joshi, N.P. (2024). Linking farmers to markets: Assessing small-scale farmers’ preferences for an official phytosanitary regime in the Kyrgyz Republic. Economic Analysis and Policy, 81, 696708. doi: 10.1016/j.eap.2023.12.016..
[34] Shabir, I., Dash, K.K., Dar, A.H., Pandey, V.K., Fayaz, U., Srivastava, S., & Nisha, R. (2023). Carbon footprints evaluation for sustainable food processing system: A comprehensive review. Future Foods, 7, article number 100215. doi: 10.1016/j.fufo.2023.100215.
[35] Shen, W. (2024). A study on the dual benefits of ESG practices on corporate sustainability and investment returns based on big data analytics. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences, 9(1), 1-17. doi: 10.2478/amns2024-3060.
[36] Shumka, S., Sulçe, S., Brahushi, F., Shumka, L., & Hyso, H. (2021). Biomass energy for productive use in the olive oil and other agriculture sectors in Albania. Proceedings on Engineering Sciences, 3(1), 103-110. doi: 10.24874/ PES03.01.010.
[37] Sonu, T.S., Mohammed, F.C., & Rajan, P.D. (2024). Assessment of regional flood vulnerability: A case of Kuttanad Wetland System, Kerala, India. Regional Statistics, 14(5), 970-1005. doi: 10.15196/rs140507.
[38] Soretz, S., Nodehi, M., & Taghvaee, V.M. (2023). Sustainability and sustainable development concepts: Defining the perspectives and pillars. Reference Module in Social Sciences. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-44-313776-1.00030-1.
[39] Sweden – CAP strategic plan. (2024). Retrieved from https://agriculture.ec.europa.eu/cap-my-country/capstrategic-plans/sweden_en.
[40] Vrabcova, P., & Urbancova, H. (2023). Sustainable innovation in agriculture: Building a strategic management system to ensure competitiveness and business sustainability. Agricultural Economics, 69(1), 1-12. doi: 10.17221/321/2022-AGRICECON.
[41] World Bank Group (2024). Arable land (% of land area) – Kyrgyz Republic. Retrieved from https://data.worldbank. org/indicator/AG.LND.ARBL.ZS?end=2021&locations=KG&start=1992&view=chart.
[42] World Bank Group, Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security, CIAT (2018). Climate-smart agriculture for the Kyrgyz Republic. Retrieved from https://climateknowledgeportal.worldbank.org/sites/default/files/2019-06/ CSA%20_Profile_The%20Kyrgyz%20Republic.pdf.
[43] Xu, Y., Li, Y., Zhang, M., & Zhang, S. (2024). Sustainable agriculture in the digital era: Past, present, and future trends by bibliometric analysis. Heliyon, 10(14), article number e34612. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34612.
[44] Zaika, S., Hridin, O., & Zaika, O. (2023). Innovations in sustainable agricultural development: Trends, issues, perspectives. Economy and Society, 52. doi: 10.32782/2524-0072/2023-52-69.
[45] Ziaul, I., & Shuwei, W. (2023). Environmental sustainability: A major component of sustainable development. International Journal of Environmental, Sustainability, and Social Science, 4(3), 900-907. doi: 10.38142/ijesss. v4i2.296.