Regulation of the weed component in the maize phytocoenosis using herbicides for the sustainable functioning of agroecosystems

Tetiana Tymoshchuk, Oleh Kharchuk
Download article Read article

Abstract

Maize is a crop with low competitive ability against weeds, especially at the early stages of growth and development. The problem of weed infestation in maize crops during the critical period of vegetation remained one of the key factors and led to a substantial reduction in the realisation of the crop yield potential. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of herbicide application for regulating the weed component in the maize phytocoenosis and its impact on yield formation. The research was conducted during 2024-2025 under the conditions of Biryt Shevchenko LLC in Zhytomyr region on soddy medium-podzolic soils. The effectiveness of herbicides for regulating segetal vegetation in the phytocoenosis of three maize hybrids depending on the timing and application rates was highlighted. The combined application of the pre-emergence herbicide Primextra TZ Gold and the post-emergence herbicide Elumis ensured a reduction in the number of grass and broadleaf weeds in the maize phytocoenosis. The highest indicators of weed reduction were recorded at Primextra TZ Gold rates of 4.0-4.5 L/ha in combination with Elumis at 1.75-2.0 L/ha. Differences in weed infestation of phytocoenoses among hybrids were established, in particular higher values in the hybrid SY Fortago compared with SY Phenomen and SY Marimba. The combined use of Primextra TZ Gold (3.5-4.5 L/ha) and Elumis (1.75-2.0 L/ha) ensured effectiveness at the level of 94-98% control of grass and broadleaf weeds in crops of maize hybrids. The combined application of Primextra TZ Gold (4.0 L/ha) and Elumis (1.75 L/ha) ensured the maximum grain yield of the maize hybrids SY Phenomen (9.82 t/ha) and SY Marimba (10.08 t/ha). The highest productivity of the hybrid SY Fortago (9.16 t/ha) was ensured by applying the combination of Primextra TZ Gold (4.0 L/ha) and Elumis (1.5 L/ha). The obtained results could be used to develop and scientifically substantiate effective strategies for the control of segetal plants in maize phytocoenoses aimed at reducing weed infestation during the critical period of crop development and ensuring the sustainable functioning of agroecosystems

Keywords

agrocenosis; segetal vegetation; grain yield; synergism; ecological sustainability; herbicide load; control strategy

  1. Absy, R. (2019). Weed control efficiency of some pre-and post-emergence herbicides in maize. Journal of Plant Productiondoi: 10.21608/JPP.2019.69816.
  2. Alptekin, H., Ozkan, A., Gurbuz, R., & Kulak, M. (2023). Management of weeds in maize by sequential or individual applications of pre-and post-emergence herbicides. Agriculture, 13(2), article number 421. doi: 10.3390/agriculture13020421.
  3. Anand, G., Arshdeep, S., Kritika, S.A., Guttikonda, P.S., Zeeshan, A.S., Shimpy, S., Sanchit, T., & Iza, F. (2025). Evaluating the impact of pre- and post-emergence herbicides on weed dynamics and sustainable Maize cultivation practices. Plant Science Today, 12(2), 1-9. doi: 10.14719/pst.7353.
  4. Convention on Biological Diversity. (1992, June). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_030#Text.
  5. Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora. (1979, June). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_129#Text.
  6. Devkota, M., Sai, R., Shrestha, A., Chaudhary, S., Koirala, P., & Mahato, M. (2024). Weed management effects on weed dynamics, yield and economics of spring maize at Dang, Nepal. Turkish Journal of Agriculture – Food Science and Technology, 12(s1), 1997-2008. doi: 10.24925/turjaf.v12is1.1997-2008.6865.  
  7. DSTU 4115-2002. (2003). Soils. Determination of mobile phosphorus and potassium compounds using the modified Chirikov method. Retrieved from https://online.budstandart.com/ua/catalog/doc-page?id_doc=58863&utm.
  8. DSTU 7855:2015. (2016). Soil quality. Determination of group gumus composition on method of Tjurin in Kononova and Belchikova’s updating. Retrieved from https://online.budstandart.com/ua/catalog/doc-page.html?id_doc=62737.
  9. DSTU 7863:2015. (2016). Soil quality. Determination of available hydrolyzable nitrogen by Kornfild method. Retrieved from https://online.budstandart.com/ua/catalog/doc-page.html?id_doc=62745&utm.
  10. DSTU ISO 10390:2022. (2022). Soil, treated biowaste, and sludge. Determination of pH (ISO 10390:2021, IDT). Retrieved from https://online.budstandart.com/ua/catalog/doc-page.html?id_doc=97744.
  11. Gerasko, T., Tymoshchuk, T., Moisiienko, V., Hrytsiuk, N., & Alekseeva, T. (2024). Phytocoenotic assessment of herbaceous plant communities in the organic sweet cherry orchard. Scientific Horizons, 27(5), 32-50. doi: 10.48077/scihor5.2024.32.
  12. Gurmanchuk, O., Plotnytska, N., Nevmerzhytska, O., Pavliuk, I., Tymoshchuk, T., & Bondareva, L. (2020). Control of weed component in maize crops when applying postemergent herbicides. Scientific Horizons, 23(7), 53-58. doi: 10.33249/2663-2144-2020-92-7-53-58.
  13. Gurtovenko, V., & Tsyuk, O. (2024). Efficiency of application of soil herbicides on sunflower crops. Scientific Reports of the National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, 20(3). doi: 10.31548/dopovidi.3(109).2024.008.
  14. Hurmanchuk, O., Plotnytska, N., Nevmerzhytska, O., Hrytsiuk, N., & Tymoshchuk, T. (2025). Control of segetal vegetation in the agrocenosis of common buckwheat. Scientific Horizons, 28(10), 85-92. doi: 10.48077/scihor10.2025.85.
  15. Hutianskyi, R., & Zuza, V. (2022). The efficiency of application of post-emerging herbicides in corn sowing in the Eastern Forest Steppe of Ukraine. Bulletin of Agricultural Science, 9(834), 34-42. doi: 10.31073/agrovisnyk202209-04.
  16. Idziak, R., & Woznica, Z. (2020). Efficacy of reduced rates of soil-applied dimethenamid-P and pendimethalin mixture followed by postemergence herbicides in maize. Agriculture, 10(5), article number 163. doi: 10.3390/agriculture10050163.
  17. Idziak, R., Waligóra, H., & Szuba, V. (2022). The influence of agronomical and chemical weed control on weeds of corn. Journal of Plant Protection Research, 62(2), 215-222. doi: 10.24425/jppr.2022.141362.
  18. Kryvulko, M.V. (2025). Degree of sunflower crops weed infestation under various plant protection systems. Feeds and Feed Production, 99, 127-135. doi: 10.31073/kormovyrobnytstvo202599-11.
  19. Markovska, O.Ye., Dudchenko, V.V., Pikovskyi, M.Y., & Mechet, A.O. (2024). Phytosanitary condition of maize agrocoenosis depending on measures to regulate pest organisms in the conditions of the Northern Steppe of Ukraine. Taurida Scientific Herald, 140, 165-175. doi: 10.32782/2226-0099.2024.140.22.
  20. Milenko, О.H., Solod, I.S., Mohylat, P.H., Hryn, M.E., & Veherenko, V.S. (2020). Effectiveness of post-emergence herbicides application on reas of corn grown for grain. Bulletin of Poltava State Agrarian Academy, 4, 86-92. doi: 10.31210/visnyk2020.04.10.
  21. Mitkov, A., Yanev, M., Neshev, N., Tityanov, M., & Tonev, T. (2019). Herbicide control of the weeds in maize (Zea mays L.)Scientific Papers. Series A. Agronomy, LXII(1), 368-373.
  22. Okrushko, S. (2019). Adjustment of weeds in corn crops. Young Scientist, 2(66), 319-322. doi: 10.32839/2304-5809/2019-2-66-69.
  23. Shevchenko, S.M., Shevchenko, M.S., Derevenets-Shevchenko, K.A., Kozechko, V.I., & Zavertaliuk, O.V. (2025). The impact of systematic herbicide application on maize grain yield. Podilian Bulletin: Agriculture, Engineering, Economics, 46, 136-142. doi: 10.37406/2706-9052-2025-1.19.
  24. Shokalo, N.S., & Beletskyi, V.O. (2022). Application of post-emergence herbicides in corn crops for grain. Taurida Scientific Herald, 123, 153-158. doi: 10.32851/2226-0099.2022.123.21.
  25. Skatula, Yu.M., & Ostapchuk, R.V. (2023). Effectiveness of herbicides in corn agrocenoses. Scientific Reports of the National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, 19(5). doi: 10.31548/dopovidi5(105).2023.009.
  26. Soroka, S.Y. (2025). Assessment of the level of weed intensity of corn hybrid crop crops depending on the application of herbicides and various plant densities. Agriculture and Foresty, 2(37), 219-228. doi: 10.37128/2707-5826-2025-2-19.
  27. Sudak, V., Horbatenko, A., Semenov, S., & Kulyk А. (2021). Testing of herbicidal systems for maize cultivation in the Steppe of Ukraine. Quarantine and Plant Protection, 2, 32-36. doi: 10.36495/2312-0614.2021.2.32-36.
  28. Tkalich, Y., Kolesnykova, K., & Nazarenko, M. (2023). Effectiveness of herbicides and plant growth regulators in corn crops. Agrology, 5(3), 97-103. doi: 10.32819/021115.
  29. Veselovsky, I.V., Lysenko, A.K., & Manko, Y.P. (1988). Weed identifier atlas. Kyiv: Urozhay.
  30. Wiqar, B., Noori, M.S., & Amini, S.Y. (2021). Effects of weed management on agronomic performance and productivity of hybrid maize (Zea mays L.). Journal of Agriculture and Applied Biology, 2(2), 70-75. doi: 10.11594/jaab.02.02.01
  31. Yoshitha, S., Sagar, L., & Reddy, M.D. (2025). Management of weeds in summer maize (Zea mays L.) by pre and post emergence herbicides. Plant Science Today, 12(1). doi: 10.14719/pst.3209
  32. Yukhymuk, V.V., Radchenko, M.P., Sytnik, S.K., & Morderer, Y.Y. (2022). Effects of interaction and effectiveness of weed control when using tank mixtures of herbicides in maize crops. Regulatory Mechanisms in Biosystems, 13(2), 114-120. doi: 10.15421/022216.
Tymoshchuk, T., & Kharchuk, O. (2026). Regulation of the weed component in the maize phytocoenosis using herbicides for the sustainable functioning of agroecosystems. Scientific Horizons, 29(1), 41-51. https://doi.org/10.48077/scihor1.2026.41