Assessment of the impact of the component composition of grass mixtures on the productivity of sown agrocenoses in the Precarpathian region

Nataliуa Karasevych, Taras Martsinko, Liubomyr Buhryn, Andrii Dzubaylo, Stepan Begey
Download article Read article

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the effect of the component composition of perennial grass mixtures on the productivity of sown agrocenoses under the soil and climatic conditions of the Precarpathian region. Field experiments were conducted in 2020-2024 on sod-podzolic soils, using a summer sowing method without a cover crop and applying mineral fertilisers at a rate of N₃₀P₆₀K₉₀, following the methodological recommendations of the National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine. Yield was assessed using the plot-by-weight method; the content of absolutely dry matter was determined by drying samples at 105°C; and the botanical composition of the stands was analysed based on selective samples of green mass. The results showed that the highest productivity was achieved with multi-component grass mixtures comprising both grass and legume species. An optimal balance of components in the mixtures had a positive effect on dry matter yield, energy efficiency, and stand resilience. The generalised findings indicated that the inclusion of legumes – particularly red clover (Trifolium pratense), alfalfa (Medicago sativa), and common bird’s-foot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus) – increased yield by 30%-45% compared with monoculture sowings. The dynamics of changes in botanical composition over three cuts were analysed. It was found that multi-component mixtures formed a more stable stand structure and ensured a higher proportion of legume components in the second and third cuts. An energy assessment confirmed the feasibility of using mixed sowings due to their higher energy return ratio. The findings can be applied by agronomists, fodder production specialists, and practitioners of ecosystem-based farming to establish highly productive and stable stands in the Precarpathian region

Keywords

crop yield; dry matter content; botanical composition of grass stand; grass mixtures; energy efficiency

  1. Babych, A.O., Kulyk, M.F., & Makarenko, P.S. (1998). Methodology for conducting experiments on feed production and animal feeding. Kyiv: Ahrarna Nauka.
  2. Convention on Biological Diversity. (1992, June). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_030#Text.
  3. Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora. (1979, June). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_129#Text.
  4. de Haas, B., Hoekstra, N., Schoot, J.R., Visser, E.J., Kroon, H., & Eekeren, N.V. (2019). Combining agro-ecological functions in grass-clover mixtures. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 4(3), 547-567. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2019.3.547.
  5. DSTU 6017:2008. (2010). Natural fodder grounds. The method of botanical research of the grass stands. Retrieved from https://online.budstandart.com/ua/catalog/doc-page.html?id_doc=91707.
  6. DSTU ISO 6497:2005. (2008). Fodder for animals. Sampling methods (ISO 6497:2002, IDT). Retrieved from https://online.budstandart.com/ua/catalog/doc-page?id_doc=91972.
  7. Dziubailo, A.H., & Pylypiv, N.I. (2022). The dynamics of the sowed herb density depending on the fertilization. Foothill and Mountain Agriculture and Animal Husbandry, 71(1), 80-95. doi: 10.32636/01308521.2022-(71)-1-5.
  8. Feng, Y., Shi, Y., Zhao, M., Shen, H., Xu, L., Luo, Y., Liu, Y., Xang, A., Kang, J., Jing, H., & Fang, J. (2022). Yield and quality properties of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) and their influencing factors in China. European Journal of Agronomy, 141, article number 126637. doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2022.126637.
  9. Karbivska, U.M., Martyshchuk, V., Kyrhak, V., & Voloshchuk, M. (2020). Effectiveness of the surface improvement of the mountain slope meadows of the Carpathians. Bulletin of Agrarian Science, 98(7), 38-45. doi: 10.31073/agrovisnyk202007-05.
  10. Komainda, M., Küchenmeister, K., Küchenmeister, F., Breitsameter, L., Wrage-Mönnig, N., Kayser, M., & Isselstein, J. (2019). Forage legumes for future dry climates: Lower relative biomass losses of minor forage legumes compared to Trifolium repens under conditions of periodic drought stress. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 205(5), 460-469. doi: 10.1111/jac.12337.
  11. Kovtun, K.P., Veklenko, Yu.A., Korniichuk, O.V., & Babych-Poberezhna, A.A. (2020). Biochemical composition and forage productivity of lotus corniculatus (Lotus Corniculatus L.) in the conditions of the Right Bank Forest Steppe of Ukraine. Norwegian Journal of Development of the International Science, 45, 4-7.
  12. Kurhak, V.H., & Karbivska, U.M. (2020). Features of the formation of legume-cereal agrophytocenoses on sod-podzolic soils of the Carpathian region of Ukraine. Feeds and Feed Production, 89, 121-133. doi: 10.31073/kormovyrobnytstvo202089.
  13. Martsinko, T.I. (2020). The influence of fertilizer on the productivity and botanical and economic composition of sown meadow agrocenoses. Foothill and Mountain Agriculture and Animal Husbandry, 68(1), 135-145. doi: 10.32636/01308521.2020-(68)-1-10.
  14. Medvedovskyi, O.K., & Ivanenko, P.I. (1988). Energy analysis of intensive technologies in agricultural production. Kyiv: Urozhay.
  15. Monjardino, M., Loi, A., Thomas, D.T., Revell, C.K., Flohr, B.M., Llewellyn, R.S., & Norman, H.C. (2022). Improved legume pastures increase economic value, resilience and sustainability of crop-livestock systems. Agricultural Systems, 203, article number 103519. doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2022.103519.
  16. Olifirovych, V.O., & Veklenko, Yu.A. (2021). Increasing the efficiency of cultivation of alfalfa and cereal grass mixtures on eroded slopes. Fodder and Fodder Production, 91, 93-102. doi: 10.31073/kormovyrobnytstvo202191-08.
  17. Panakhyd, H., Konyk, H., & Stasiv, O. (2020). Economic evaluation of models ofestablishmentand use technologies of legume-grass. Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, 6(3), 221-234. doi: 10.51599/are.2020.06.03.12.
  18. Patra, P.S., & Paul, T. (2021). Lucerne (Alfalfa). In Md. Hedayetullah & P. Zaman (Eds.), Forage crops of the world (pp. 231-243). Florida: CRC Press, Apple Academic Press, Inc.
  19. Petrychenko, V.F., Hetman, N.Ia., & Veklenko, Yu.A. (2020). The rationale for the productivity of seeded alfalfa under long-term use of grass stands under climate change conditions. Bulletin of Agrarian Science, 98(3), 20-26. doi: 10.31073/agrovisnyk202003-03.
  20. Rognli, O.A., Pecetti, L., Rao Kovi, M., & Annicchiarico, P. (2021). Grass and legume breeding match the future needs of European grassland farming. Grass and Forage Science, 76(2), 175-185. doi: 10.1111/gfs.12535.
  21. Senyk, I.I. (2020). The formation of the botanical composition of clover-cereal and alfalfa-cereal agrophytocenoses depends on the sowing method. Agrobiology, 1, 160-169. doi: 10.33245/2310-9270-2020-157-1-160-168.
  22. State register of plant varieties suitable for distribution in Ukraine. (2025). Retrieved from https://minagro.gov.ua/napryamki/roslinnictvo/reyestr-sortiv-roslin-ukrayini/reyestr-sortiv-roslin-ukrayini.
  23. Ushkarenko, V.O., Vozhehova, R.A., Holoborodko, S.P., & Kokovikhin, S.V. (2014). Methodology of the field experiment. Kherson: D.S. Grin.
  24. Zhang, H.H., Shi, S.L., Wu, B., Li, Z.L., & Li, X.L. (2022). A study of yield interactions in mixed sowings of alfalfa and three perennial grasses. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 31(2), 159-170. doi: 10.11686/cyxb2021175.
  25. Zhang, Y.L., Teng, Z., Hao., Yu, T.F., & Zhang, Y.X. (2024). Effects of different mixed sowing patterns and sowing ratios of alfalfa on grassland productivity and community stability in grass-legume mixtures. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 33(2), 185-197. doi: 10.11686/cyxb2023161.
Karasevych, N., Martsinko, T., Buhryn, L., Dzubaylo, A., & Begey, S. (2026). Assessment of the impact of the component composition of grass mixtures on the productivity of sown agrocenoses in the Precarpathian region. Scientific Horizons, 29(1), 9-19. https://doi.org/10.48077/scihor1.2026.09