Assessment of the effectiveness of state aid to agricultural producers

Saule Spatayeva, Laura Alikulova, Zina Shaukerova, Dina Aikupesheva, Aigul Akhmetova
Received: 30.09.2024 Revised: 10.04.2025 Accepted: 28.05.2025
Retrieved from Vol. 28, No. 6, 2025 Pages: 165-179
Download article Read article

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify the key factors influencing the effectiveness of state support for agricultural producers in Kazakhstan, as well as to assess its influence on the development of the agro-industrial complex. The study employed methods of systematic analysis and comparative assessment, which helped to identify the specific features of state support for agricultural producers, determine its impact on the economic development of the agro-industrial complex, and the validity of the allocation of budget resources. The analysis found that the total amount of budget funds allocated to support agriculture in Kazakhstan increased from KZT 300 bn in 2015 to KZT 750 bn in 2024, with the share of subsidies growing from KZT 150 bn to KZT 410 bn. However, most of the funding goes to large agricultural holdings, while small and medium-sized farms face challenges accessing financial and material resources. The analysis revealed that state aid positively influences agricultural productivity growth. For example, grain yields increased from 1.12 t/ha in 2015 to 1.63 t/ha in 2024, while milk production increased from 4.8 mn t to 6.7 mn t. However, the availability of subsidies does not always lead to increased profitability. For example, despite the expansion of preferential lending from KZT 100 bn to KZT 280 bn, small farmers still face excessive costs and challenges in obtaining financial resources. The pace of digitalisation in the agro-industrial complex continues to be insufficient: the introduction of precision farming is limited by a lack of infrastructure and specialists. The experience of the EU, the US, and Australia, where state support stimulates innovative solutions, suggests the need to expand technological modernisation programmes. As a result, the study concluded that subsidies need to be redistributed in favour of small and medium-sized farms, control over the targeted use of funds must be strengthened, and digital technologies must be actively introduced to improve the efficiency of the agricultural sector

Keywords

subsidies; preferential lending; audit of budget expenditure; crop yields; technical modernisation

  1. Adewusi, N.A.O., Chiekezie, N.N.R., & Eyo-Udo, N.N.L. (2023). Blockchain technology in agriculture: Enhancing supply chain transparency and traceability. Finance & Accounting Research Journal, 5(12), 479-501. doi: 10.51594/ farj.v5i12.1514.
  2. Adisa, O., Ilugbusi, B.S., Adelekan, O.A., Asuzu, O.F., & Ndubuisi, N.L. (2024). A comprehensive review of redefining agricultural economics for sustainable development: Overcoming challenges and seizing opportunities in a changing world. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 21(1), 2329-2341. doi: 10.30574/ wjarr.2024.21.1.0322.
  3. Ang, K.L.M., & Seng, J.K.P. (2021). Big data and machine learning with hyperspectral information in agriculture. IEEE Access, 9, 36699-36718. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3051196.
  4. Balana, B.B., & Oyeyemi, M.A. (2022). Agricultural credit constraints in smallholder farming in developing countries: Evidence from Nigeria. World Development Sustainability, 1, article number 100012. doi: 10.1016/j. wds.2022.100012.
  5. Benami, E., Jin, Z., Carter, M.R., Ghosh, A., Hijmans, R.J., Hobbs, A., Kenduiywo, B., & Lobell, D.B. (2021). Uniting remote sensing, crop modelling and economics for agricultural risk management. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 2, 140-159. doi: 10.1038/s43017-020-00122-y.
  6. Bernini, C., & Galli, F. (2024). Economic and environmental efficiency, subsidies and spatio-temporal effects in agriculture. Ecological Economics, 218, article number 108120. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108120.
  7. Bradly, N., Stancu, C., Keenan, C., Maag, W., Mowat, A., & Reid, J. (2022). The impact of policy on sustainable land use options in New Zealand. doi: 10.57935/AGR.26001856.v1.
  8. Buzaubayeva, P., Gulzhan, A., Baimagambetova, Z., & Kenges, G. (2023). Financial technologies to support agricultural innovations in Kazakhstan: Prospects for digital development. Futurity of Social Sciences, 1(2), 3044. doi: 10.57125/FS.2023.06.20.03.
  9. Czyżewski, B., Matuszczak, A., Grzelak, A., Guth, M., & Majchrzak, A. (2021). Environmental sustainable value in agriculture revisited: How does common agricultural policy contribute to eco-efficiency? Sustainability Science, 16, 137-152. doi: 10.1007/s11625-020-00834-6.
  10. de Boon, A., Sandström, C., & Rose, D.C. (2022). Governing agricultural innovation: A comprehensive framework to underpin sustainable transitions. Journal of Rural Studies, 89, 407-422. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.07.019.
  11. Duncan, E., Abdulai, A.R., & Fraser, E.D. (2021). Modernizing agriculture through digital technologies: Prospects and challenges. In S.J. Harvey (Ed.), Handbook on the human impact of agriculture (pp. 138-161). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. doi: 10.4337/9781839101748.00018.
  12. Durham, T.C., & Mizik, T. (2021). Comparative economics of conventional, organic, and alternative agricultural production systems. Economies, 9(2), article number 64. doi: 10.3390/economies9020064.
  13. Ehlers, M.-H., Huber, R., & Finger, R. (2021). Agricultural policy in the era of digitalisation. Food Policy, 100, article number 102019. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2020.102019.
  14. Ermuhan, D. (2024). How to get agricultural subsidies in Kazakhstan in 2024. Retrieved from https://surl.li/rswhzj.
  15. Faichuk, O., Voliak, L., Hutsol, T., Glowacki, S., Pantsyr, Y., Slobodian, S., Szeląg-Sikora, A., & GródekSzostak, Z. (2022). European green deal: Threats assessment for agri-food exporting countries to the EU. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(7), article number 3712. doi: 10.3390/su14073712.
  16. Getahun, S., Kefale, H., & Gelaye, Y. (2024). Application of precision agriculture technologies for sustainable crop production and environmental sustainability: A systematic review. Scientific World Journal, 2024(1), article number 2126737. doi: 10.1155/2024/2126734.
  17. Green, A.G., Abdulai, A.R., Duncan, E., Glaros, A., Campbell, M., Newell, R., Quarshie, P., Bahadur, K., Newman, L., Nost, E., & Fraser, E.D. (2021). A scoping review of the digital agricultural revolution and ecosystem services: Implications for Canadian policy and research agendas. FACETS, 6, 1955-1985. doi: 10.1139/facets-2021-0017.
  18. Guo, Z., Chen, X., & Zhang, Y. (2022). Impact of environmental regulation perception on farmers’ agricultural green production technology adoption: A new perspective of social capital. Technology in Society, 71, article number 102085. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102085.
  19. Guth, M., Stępień, S., Smędzik-Ambroży, K., & Matuszczak, A. (2022). Is small beautiful? Techinical efficiency and environmental sustainability of small-scale family farms under the conditions of agricultural policy support. Journal of Rural Studies, 89, 235-247. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.11.026.
  20. Ismayilov, V., Mammadov, S., Abbasova, N., Babayeva, V., & Sadigova, S. (2023). The current state and prospects for further development in the energy sector in Australia: Reforms, foreign economic relations, investment climate. Polityka Energetyczna, 26(2), 105-120. doi: 10.33223/epj/163451.
  21. Kambali, U., & Panakaje, N. (2022). A Review on access to agriculture finance by farmers and its impact on their income. International Journal of Case Studies in Business, IT, and Education, 6(1), 302-327. doi: 10.5281/ zenodo.6513301.
  22. Kamguia, B., Tadadjeu, S., Miamo, C., & Njangang, H. (2022). Does foreign aid impede economic complexity in developing countries? International Economics, 169, 71-88. doi: 10.1016/j.inteco.2021.10.004.
  23. Ketners, K., Jarockis, A., & Petersone, M. (2024). State budget system improvement for informed decisionmaking in Latvia. Scientific Bulletin of Mukachevo State University. Series Economics, 11(3), 86-99. doi: 10.52566/ msu-econ3.2024.86.
  24. Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan No. 392-V LRK “On Governmental Audit and Financial Control”. (2015, November). Retrieved from https://adilet.zan.kz/eng/docs/Z1500000392.
  25. Lin, W., & Huang, J. (2021). Impacts of agricultural incentive policies on land rental prices: New evidence from China. Food Policy, 104, article number 102125. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2021.102125.
  26. Liu, F., Wang, C., Luo, M., Zhou, S., & Liu, C. (2022). An investigation of the coupling coordination of a regional agricultural economics-ecology-society composite based on a data-driven approach. Ecological Indicators, 143, article number 109363. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109363.
  27. Malhi, G.S., Kaur, M., & Kaushik, P. (2021). Impact of climate change on agriculture and its mitigation strategies: A review. Sustainability, 13(3), article number 1318. doi: 10.3390/su13031318.
  28. McGreevy, S.R., Tamura, N., Kobayashi, M., Zollet, S., Hitaka, K., Nicholls, C.I., & Altieri, M.A. (2021). Amplifying agroecological farmer lighthouses in contested territories: Navigating historical conditions and forming new clusters in Japan. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 5, article number 699694. doi: 10.3389/ fsufs.2021.699694.
  29. Meng, M., Yu, L., & Yu, X. (2024). Machinery structure, machinery subsidies, and agricultural productivity: Evidence from China. Agricultural Economics, 55(2), 223-246. doi: 10.1111/agec.12820.
  30. Moahid, M., Khan, G.D., Yoshida, Y., Joshi, N.P., & Maharjan, K.L. (2021). Agricultural credit and extension services: Does their synergy augment farmers’ economic outcomes? Sustainability, 13(7), article number 3758. doi: 10.3390/su13073758.
  31. Musca, S., & Kara, M. (2023). Development of the agro-industrial complex of the Republic of Moldova, ways to improve the sphere and management system. University Economic Bulletin, 18(3), 114-122. doi: 10.31470/2306546X-2023-58-114-122.
  32. Nugroho, A.D., Cubillos Tovar, J.P., Bopushev, S.T., Bozsik, N., Fehér, I., & Lakner, Z. (2022). Effects of corruption control on the number of undernourished people in developing countries. Foods, 11(7), article number 924. doi: 10.3390/foods11070924.
  33. Order of the Minister of Finance of the Republic of Kazakhstan No. 873 “On Approval of the Procedural Standard for Internal State Audit and Financial Control Over the Performance of the Efficiency Audit by Internal Audit Services”. (2018, October). Retrieved from https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/V1800017690.
  34. Panchasara, H., Samrat, N.H., & Islam, N. (2021). Greenhouse gas emissions trends and mitigation measures in Australian agriculture sector – a review. Agriculture, 11(2), article number 85. doi: 10.3390/agriculture11020085.
  35. Regulatory Resolution of the Accounts Committee for Control over the Execution of the Republican Budget No. 6-НК “On Approval of the Rules for Conducting External State Audit and Financial Control”. (2020, July). Retrieved from https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/V2000021070.
  36. Sagbo, N.S.M., & Kusunose, Y. (2021). Does experience with agricultural loans improve farmers’ well-being? Evidence from Benin. Agricultural Finance Review, 81(4), 503-519. doi: 10.1108/AFR-06-2020-0082.
  37. Shahini, E., & Shtal, T. (2023). Assessment of the level of competitiveness of Ukrainian agricultural holdings in international markets. Ekonomika APK, 30(6), 45-56. doi: 10.32317/2221-1055.202306045.
  38. Sodoma, R., Brukh, O., Shmatkovska, T., Vavdiiuk, N., Bilochenko, A., Kupyra, M., & Berezhnytska, G. (2021). Financing of the agro-industrial complex in the context of the implementation of international experience. Financial and Credit Activities: Problems of Theory and Practic, 3(38), 341-350.
  39. Stadnyk, V., Krasovska, G., Izhevskiy, P., Tomalia, T., Khomych, L., & Matveev, P. (2021). Motivational aspects of development of strategic network partnership in the agro-industrial complex. Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, 7(2), 77-101. doi: 10.22004/ag.econ.313630.
  40. State support for agriculture. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.gov.kz/memleket/entities/aqmola-ush/ activities/7959?lang=en.
  41. Stender, S., Borkovska, V., & Balla, І. (2024). State regulation of agriculture in the conditions of digitalisation of Ukraine’s economy. Ukrainian Black Sea Region Agrarian Science, 28(2), 53-64. doi: 10.56407/bs.agrarian/2.2024.53.
  42. Subsidies for crop production. (2023). Retrieved from https://egov.kz/cms/en/articles/agriculture/subsidies_ for_agriculture.
  43. Tan, D., Adedoyin, F.F., Alvarado, R., Ramzan, M., Kayesh, M.S., & Shah, M.I. (2022). The effects of environmental degradation on agriculture: Evidence from European countries. Gondwana Research, 106, 92-104. doi: 10.1016/j. gr.2021.12.009.
  44. Viana, C.M., Freire, D., Abrantes, P., Rocha, J., & Pereira, P. (2022). Agricultural land systems importance for supporting food security and sustainable development goals: A systematic review. Science of the Total Environment, 806(3), article number 150718. doi; 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150718.
  45. Yuksel, K., Nursoy, M., & Zhumaksanova, K.M. (2023). Evaluation of the efficiency of the agro-industrial complex in the country’s economy. Turan University Bulletin, 1, 196-211. doi: 10.46914/1562-2959-2023-1-1-196-211.
  46. Zhang, R., Ma, W., & Liu, J. (2021). Impact of government subsidy on agricultural production and pollution: A game-theoretic approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 285, article number 124806. doi: 10.1016/j. jclepro.2020.124806.
Spatayeva, S., Alikulova, L., Shaukerova, Zю, Aikupesheva, D., & Akhmetova, A. (2025). Assessment of the effectiveness of state aid to agricultural producers. Scientific Horizons, 28(6), 165-179. https://doi.org/10.48077/scihor6.2025.165