Analysis of the typological structure of forests in western Ukraine

Oleksandr Bondar, Anatolii Vyshnevskyi, Yevhen Melnyk, Ihor Halahan
Download article Read article

Abstract

The aim of the study was to conduct an ecological and typological assessment of forest site conditions across eight administrative oblasts of western Ukraine and to identify regional differences in the proportions of trophotopes and stand types. The classification of forest types was carried out using the silvicultural-ecological scale of forest typology based on state forest inventory materials. Comparative analysis, typological grouping and statistical data processing were applied to determine the areas, proportions and structural features of forest types. The distribution of the area of land covered with forest vegetation across four soil fertility groups was analysed, which made it possible to identify the dominance of sugrud and grud site conditions in the mountainous parts of the region. It was established that the largest areas of sugruds were concentrated in Ivano-Frankivsk and Zakarpattia oblasts, whereas bor and subor complexes remained substantial in Volyn and Rivne oblasts. The number of delineated forest types ranged from 29 in Ternopil Oblast to 89 in Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast, reflecting the contrast of the region’s natural conditions. The typological structure of individual oblasts was detailed and the diversity of the Carpathian sector was demonstrated, where various variants of beech forests, sub-beech forests and suyalychnyk forest types predominated, indicating the combined effects of altitudinal zonation and moisture gradients. It was found that the Polissia sector was characterised by a concentration of areas in oak-pine subors and black alder sugruds, which formed a core of hydrological and biotic stability. It was generalised that the Podillia oblasts were typified by a simpler typological spectrum with the dominance of hornbeam and oak oakwoods, correlating with more homogeneous soil and climatic conditions. The practical value of the results was associated with their potential use by forestry enterprises and nature conservation institutions to substantiate measures for sustainable forest management, stand restoration and the zoning of recreational pressure

Keywords

forest site conditions; typological structure; edaphic grid; trophotopes; hygrotopes; beech communities; oak-pine subors

  1. Altman, J., Fibich, P., Trotsiuk, V., & Altmanova, N. (2024). Global pattern of forest disturbances and its shift under climate change. Science of The Total Environment, 915, article number 170117. doi: 10.1016/j. scitotenv.2024.170117.
  2. Barredo, J. I., Vizzarri, M., & Kuželová, K. (2024). Archetypal typology of European forest ecosystems integrating management intensity and naturalness. Ambio, 53, 1587-1598. doi: 10.1007/s13280-024-02050-3.
  3. Gharun, M., Shekhar, A., Xiao, J., Li, X., & Buchmann, N. (2024). Effect of the 2022 summer drought across forest types in Europe. Biogeosciences, 21(23), 5481-5494. doi: 10.5194/bg-21-5481-2024.
  4. Holubchak, O.I., Hnatiuk, O.R., Ivaniuk, A.P., & Hudyma, V.D. (2024). Typological structure of protective forests in the Ukrainian Carpathians. In Forestry education and science: Current challenges and development prospects.  International science-practical conference (pp. 1-3). Lviv: Ukrainian National Forestry University. doi: 10.36930/ conf150.1.25.
  5. Kameniar, O., Baláž, M., Svitok, M., Mikoláš, M., Ferenčík, M., Frankovič, M., Ralhan, D., Gloor, R., & Svoboda, M. (2023). Spruce- and beech-dominated primary forests in the western Carpathians differ in terms of forest structure and bird assemblages, independently of disturbance regimes. European Journal of Environmental Sciences, 13(1), 47-59. doi: 10.14712/23361964.2023.6.
  6. Kitano, H., Nagashima, K., & Nakata, Y. (2025). Classification of forest vegetation types considering forest vertical stratification using airborne laser scanning data in Japan. Ecological Indicators, 179, article number 114244. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.114244.
  7. Lavnyy, V., & Matusevych, O. (2022). Typological structure and productivity of spruce forests in the Ukrainian Carpathians. Proceedings of the Forestry Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 24, 66-78. doi: 10.15421/412206.
  8. Morichetti, M., Vangi, E., & Collalti, A. (2024). Predicted future changes in the mean seasonal carbon cycle due to climate change. Forests, 15(7), article number 1124. doi: 10.3390/f15071124.
  9. Moroz, V. (2024). Bioproductivity of pine forests in Polissia. Scientific Reports of the National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, 20(5), 120-134. doi: 10.31548/dopovidi/5.2024.120.
  10. Myroniuk, V., & von Dosky, V. (2024). Analysis of temporal changes (2019–2023) of forest attributes in Ukraine. Kyiv: SFI.
  11. Myskivets, I. (2024). The ecological role of nature reserves in the Volyn Forest-Steppe of Ukraine. Ecological Sciences, 6(57), 15-19. doi: 10.32846/2306-9716/2024.eco.6-57.2.
  12. Ostapenko, B.F., & Tkach, V.P. (2002). Forest typology. Kharkiv: Pleyada.
  13. Pohrebnyak, P.S. (1993). Forest ecology and forest typology. Kyiv: Naukova dumka.
  14. Ridwan, Q., & Hanief, M. (2025). Tree composition, regeneration potential and anthropogenic disturbanc es across major forest types of Rajouri in the Pir Panjal region of north-western Himalaya. Forest Ecology and Management, 595, article number 123030. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2025.123030.
  15. Rushchak, V., & Chepurnyi, I. (2025). Assessment of Forest cover dynamics in landslide-prone areas of the Ukrainian Carpathians using remote sensing data. In 18th International conference monitoring of geological processes and ecological condition of the environment (pp.1-5). Kyiv: European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers. doi: 10.3997/2214-4609.2025510172.
  16. Scherpenhuijzen, N., West, T.A.P., Debonne, N., Oostdijk, S., Adame, P., Astrup, R., & Verburg, P.H. (2025). Mapping forest management regimes in Europe. Forest Ecology and Management, 594, article number 122940. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2025.122940.
  17. Skliar, V., Sherstiuk, M., Shepeliuk, M., Kovalchuk, N., & Matiukha, D. (2025). Impact of global climate change on the biological characteristics of tree species in forest ecosystems. Ukrainian Journal of Forest and Wood Science, 16(1), 44-63. doi: 10.31548/forest/1.2025.44.
  18. Solomakha, I.V., & Chornobrov, O.Yu. (2021). Ecological-typological assessment of forest vegetation in the Middle Dnieper region (Forest-Steppe of Ukraine). Agroecological Journal, 2, 7-18. doi: 10.33730/20774893.2.2021.234448.
  19. Spathelf, P., Lavnyy, V., Matysevych, O., & Danchuk, O. (2024). German-Ukrainian efforts towards building climate-resilient forests in Western Ukraine – first results of alternative regeneration systems. South-East European Forestry, 15(1), 81-89. doi: 10.15177/seefor.24-04.
  20. Sun, D., Qiu, X., Feng, J., Ru, J., Song, J., & Wan, S. (2024). Forest types control the contribution of litter and roots to labile and persistent soil organic carbon. Biogeochemistry, 167, 1609-1617. doi: 10.1007/s10533-02401185-5.
  21. Tkach, V.P., Tarnopilska, O.M., & Orlov, O.O. (2024). Types of forest formations of Ukraine in the system of European classifications. Kharkiv: LLC Typography Madrid.
  22. Tymochko, I., Chornobrov, O., & Solomakha, I. (2022). Ecological and typological features of forest vegetation of the Emerald Network object “Tsirkunivskyi forest” in the North-Eastern Forest Steppe of Ukraine. Scientific Reports of the National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, 18(1). doi: 10.31548/ dopovidi2022.01.001.
  23. UKRDERZHISPROEKT. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://lisproekt.gov.ua/objednannja.
  24. Zhao, J., Daigneault, A., Wei, X., Salcido, E., & Weiskittel, A. (2025). Forest type, landowner practices, and climate shape tree species diversity in Maine, USA. Forest Ecology and Management, 593, article number 122919. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2025.122919.
Bondar, O., Vyshnevskyi, A., Melnyk, Ye., & Halahan, I. (2025). Analysis of the typological structure of forests in western Ukraine. Scientific Horizons, 28(12), 41-54. https://doi.org/10.48077/scihor12.2025.41