Current trends and prospects for the development of feed resources in aquaculture

Oksana Lavryniuk, Svitlana Matkovska
Received: 19.04.2025 Revised: 22.08.2025 Accepted: 24.09.2025
Retrieved from Vol. 28, No. 10, 2025 Pages: 21-31
Download article Read article

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to identify trends in changes in the production efficiency of the main groups of fish in aquaculture of Ukraine during 2022-2024 considering the influence of technological, environmental, and economic factors on the efficiency of feeding and the development of the feed base. The methodology was based on systematic, statistical and comparative analysis of data from twelve fish farming enterprises representing different levels of intensification – from pond farms to enterprises with closed water supply systems (CWSS). The analysis covered a five-year period (2020-2024) using correlation and regression analysis methods to assess feed conversion rate (FCR), cost-effectiveness, and the impact of environmental factors on productivity. As a result of the study, significant fluctuations in feed consumption volumes and interspecific differences in FCR values were established. It was revealed that the minimum feed costs occurred in 2022 (23,327.3 tonnes), and the maximum – in 2020 (34,243.3 tonnes), which is conditioned by economic and military instability. Carp species demonstrated the highest feed conversion efficiency, with FCR for broodstock and commercial fish falling to 1.2 and 1.3, respectively, in 2024. Catfish have consistently high FCR values, indicating low feeding efficiency for this group. Sturgeon showed a sharp deterioration in feed efficiency in 2023-2024 due to technological failures and the feed base degradation. Salmon showed extreme fluctuations with a record high FCR of 3.5 in 2023 and a sharp improvement to 1.0 in 2024, indicating a technological adaptation of production. It was generalised that a high FCR in a broodstock is not only a current economic loss, but also an indicator of future decline in offspring productivity, so feeding optimisation should be based on the use of functional feeds and precise control technologies. The practical significance of the study lies in the possibility of using the results obtained to develop strategies  for rational management of feed costs in fisheries enterprises of Ukraine, which will contribute to increasing the profitability and environmental sustainability of aquaculture production

Keywords

feed conversion rate (FCR); fish farms; fish feeding; broodstock and replacement stock; commercial fish

  1. Adagha, O., Ekelemu, J.K., Nwachi, O.F., & Irabor, A.E. (2024). Performance evaluation of African catfish (Clarias gariepinus) fed diets with varying dietary inclusion levels of christmas melon (Laganaria breviflorus) as a partial replacement for wheat offal. Aquaculture Journal, 4(4), 232-245. doi: 10.3390/aquacj4040017.
  2. Ai, C., Leng, X., Luo, Z., Zhou, Z., & Ai, Q. (2025). A review of the latest advances in aquaculture nutrition research. The Journal of Nutrition, 155(10), 3267-3290. doi: 10.1016/j.tjnut.2025.08.009.
  3. Boyd, C.E., & McNevin, A.A. (2023). Resource use and pollution potential in feed-based aquaculture. Reviews in Fisheries Science & Aquaculture, 32(2), 306-333. doi: 10.1080/23308249.2023.2258226.
  4. Fantatto, R.R., Mota, J., Ligeiro, C., Vieira, I., Guilgur, L.G., Santos, M., & Murta, D. (2024). Exploring sustainable alternatives in aquaculture feeding: The role of insects. Aquaculture Reports, 37, article number 102228. doi: 10.1016/j.aqrep.2024.102228.
  5. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2025). Responsible use of fishmeal in aquaculture. Rome: FAO.
  6. Glencross, B.D., Bachis, E., Robb, D., & Newton, R. (2024). The evolution of sustainability metrics for the marine ingredient sector: Moving towards holistic assessments of aquaculture feed. Reviews in Fisheries Science & Aquaculture, 32(4), 545-561. doi: 10.1080/23308249.2024.2337426.
  7. Horchanok, A., Prysiazhniuk, N., & Porotikova, I. (2021). Some aspects of negative impact of fishery management on hydrobiocenoses. In The 4th international scientific and practical conference “Modern directions of scientific research development” (pp. 11-15). Chicago: Scientific Publishing Center “Sci-conf.com.ua”.
  8. Kause, A., Nousiainen, A., & Koskinen, H. (2022). Improvement in feed efficiency and reduction in nutrient loading from rainbow trout farms: The role of selective breeding. Journal of Animal Science, 100(8), article number skac214. doi: 10.1093/jas/skac214.
  9. Klimenko, M., Grokhovska, Yu., & Yashchenko, L. (2025). Influence of temperature in aquaponic system on nitrification processes. Scientific Reports of the National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, 21(2),36-48. doi: 10.31548/dopovidi/2.2025.36.
  10. Law of Ukraine No. 400 “On Approval of State Sanitary Norms and Rules ‘Hygienic Requirements for Drinking Water Intended for Human Consumption’”. (2010, May). Retrieved from https://surl.lt/mhlhnr.
  11. Li, Y., Zhu, H., Zhou, F., Zheng, Y., Zhang, Y., & Zheng, Y. (2025). Enhanced bioconversion of kitchen food waste into aquaculture feed using a mixed culture of Bacillus licheniformis and Yarrowia lipolytica. Scientific Reports, 15, article number 16497. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-98265-9.
  12. Magbanua, T.O., & Ragaza, J.A. (2022). Systematic review and meta-analysis of the growth performance and carcass composition of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fed dietary copra meal. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 6, article number 1025538. doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2022.1025538.
  13. Myskovets, N.P. (2020). Analyzing the current status and prospects of fishing industry in Ukraine. Business Inform, 3, 104-111. doi: 10.32983/2222-4459-2020-3-104-111.
  14. Report on research work “Assessment of the state of aquatic biological resources in the Black Sea to determine possible limits and forecasts for permissible catches of aquatic biological resources and development of optimal regimes for their exploitation in fisherie”. (2022). Retrieved from https://surl.li/zuikdi.
  15. Serra, V., Pastorelli, G., Tedesco, D.E.A., Turin, L., & Guerrini, A. (2024). Alternative protein sources in aquafeed: Current scenario and future perspectives. Veterinary and Animal Science, 25, article number 100381. doi: 10.1016/j.vas.2024.100381.
  16. Sherman, I.M., Gryzhevsky, M.V., & Gritsyniak, I.I. (1999). Fish breeding and selection. Kyiv: BMT.
  17. Shi, X., Yuan, Sh., Ma, X., Tian, X., Zhang, M., Zhang, Y., Waiho, K., Fazhan, H., Xu, R., Kong, X., & Li, X. (2024). Analysis of relationship between growth traits and feed conversion ratio provides insights into aquaculture and breeding of largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides. Aquaculture, 593, article number 741352. doi: 10.1016/j. aquaculture.2024.741352.
  18. Shima, H., Asakura, T., Sakata, K., Koiso, M., & Kikuchi, J. (2024). Feed components and timing to improve the feed conversion ratio for sustainable aquaculture using starch. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 25(14), article number 7921. doi: 10.3390/ijms25147921.
  19. Sinenok, I.O. (2021). Organizational and economic mechanisms for the regulation of fishery and aquaculture. Problems and Prospects of Economics and Management, 4(16), 122-130.
  20. State agency of Ukraine for the development of land reclamation, fisheries and food programme. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://darg.gov.ua/.
  21. Thornburg, J. (2025). Feed the fish: A review of aquaculture feeders and their strategic implementation. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society, 56(2), article number e70016. doi: 10.1111/jwas.70016.
  22. Umanets, R., Balanchuk, L., Nedashkivskyi, V., Chudak, R., Tsap, S., Kryvyi, M., & Koroban, M. (2023). Nontraditional sources of protein in the feeding of african catfish Clarias Gariepinus. Scientific Reports of the National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, 19(6). doi: 10.31548/dopovidi6(106).2023.010.
  23. Uvaeva, O.I., Kotsyuba, I.G., & Yelnikova, T.O. (2020). Hydrobiology. Zhytomyr: Zhytomyr Polytechnic State University.
  24. Vdovenko, N.M., Pavlenko, M.M., & Sinenok, I.O. (2020). The organizational and economic bases for the development of fishing and aquaculture industry in Ukraine. Business Inform, 4, 221-228. doi: 10.32983/22224459-2020-4-221-228.
  25. Yadav, N.K., et al. (2025). Dissecting insects as sustainable protein bioresource in fish feed for aquaculture sustainability. Discover Food, 5, article number 47. doi: 10.1007/s44187-025-00318-5.
Lavryniuk, O., & Matkovska, S. (2025). Current trends and prospects for the development of feed resources in aquaculture. Scientific Horizons, 28(10), 21-31. https://doi.org/10.48077/scihor10.2025.21