Methodological and practical aspects of using satellite imagery to assess the military impact on soils
Abstract
The military aggression of the Russian Federation has caused significant negative impacts on Ukraine’s natural ecosystems, including its soils. Comprehensive assessments of soil conditions, the extent, and the scale of damage caused by warfare are essential for documenting the resulting losses. However, the use of traditional field surveys of soil cover is hindered by the significant threat of landmines in areas liberated from occupation. This limitation necessitates the widespread adoption of remote sensing methods, such as satellite imagery. This study aimed to assess the condition of soils and the extent of their damage due to military activity within the Chkalovske territorial community of the Chuhuiv District in the Kharkiv Region. The study identified the optimal combinations of optical bands from Sentinel-2 satellites for monitoring the consequences of military impact on soil cover. A spatial layer of objects was developed to represent various types of military-induced soil degradation within the community, including damage from continuous shelling (craters from shells, rockets, and bombs); soil compaction from the movement of military vehicles (tracks and pathways); fortification structures (defensive fighting positions and dugouts); and fires caused by shelling. Using high-resolution satellite imagery, the number of craters and the soil mass loss caused by explosions, the areas of burned and compacted land, as well as the length of anti-tank ditches and defensive fighting positions with dugouts, were calculated at the test site. On the irrigated lands of the Chkalovske territorial community, the areas affected by shelling and those burned due to military-related fires were also estimated. The information derived from satellite imagery serves as a crucial step in developing measures for the restoration of the soil cover in the pilot area affected by military degradation. The study utilised satellite imagery of varying resolutions and geographic information systems to calculate the damage caused by military actions with sufficient accuracy. It also analysed the temporal and quantitative interrelations among different types of military impact. This research will serve as a basis for assessing the scale and spatial distribution of soil damage, calculating the loss of fertile soil layers, and conducting an economic evaluation of the damage inflicted on soil resources
Keywords
remote sensing; Sentinel-2; vegetation index; military degradation; soil damage; craters
[1] Abdo, H.G., Almohamad, H., Al Dughairi, A.A., & Al-Mutiry, M. (2022). Quantifying the water soil erosion rate using RUSLE, GIS, and RS approach for Al-Qshish River Basin, Lattakia, Syria. Geofizika, 39(2), 223-241. doi: 10.15233/gfz.2022.39.12.
[2] Abdullah, M.M., Assi, A.T., Abdullah, M.T., & Feagin, R.A. (2019). Arid ecosystem resilience to total petroleum hydrocarbons disturbance: A case-study from the State of Kuwait associated with the Second Gulf War. Land Degradation and Development, 31(2), 155-167. doi: 10.1002/ldr.3435.
[3] Achasov, A.B., Seliverstov, O.Y., Diadin, D.V., & Siedov, A.O. (2023). Remote monitoring of the consequences of hostilities on the territory of the Kharkiv region. Visnyk of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series Еcоlogy, 28, 71-82. doi: 10.26565/1992-4259-2023-28-06.
[4] ArcGIS Desktop. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.esri.com/en-us/arcgis/products/arcgis-desktop/resources.
[5] Baliuk, S.A., Kucher, A.V., Solokha, M.O., & Solovei, V. B. (2024). Assessment of the impact of armed aggression of the RF on the soil cover of Ukraine. Ukrainian Geographical Journal, 1, 7-18. doi: 10.15407/ugz2024.01.007.
[6] Banwari, L.M., Tarence, T., & Bahadur, S.M. (2023). Sustainable soil utilization and agriculture production: Recommendations towards achieving sustainability. Journal of Experimental Agriculture International, 45(10), 337-348. doi: 10.9734/jeai/2023/v45i102226.
[7] Bennett, M.M., Van Den Hoek, J., Zhao, B., & Prishchepov, A.V. (2022). Improving satellite monitoring of armed conflicts. Earth’s Future, 10(9), article number 2904. doi: 10.1029/2022EF002904.
[8] Bonchkovskyi, O.S., Ostapenko, P.O., Shvaiko, V.M., & Bonchkovskyi, A.S. (2023). Remote sensing as a key tool for assessing war-induced damage to soil cover in Ukraine (the case study of Kyinska territorial hromada). Journal of Geology, Geography and Geoecology, 32(3), 474-487. doi: 10.15421/112342.
[9] Chen, F., Bai, X., Liu, F., Luo, G., Tian, Y., Qin, L., Li, Y., Xu, Y., Wang, J., Wu, L., Li, C., Zhang, S., & Ran, C. (2022). Analysis long-term and spatial changes of forest cover in typical karst areas of China. Land, 11(8), article number 1349. doi: 10.3390/land11081349.
[10] DeepStateMAP. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://deepstatemap.live.
[11] Demissie, B., Nyssen, J., Annys, S., Negash, E., Gebrehiwet, T., Abay, F., & Wolff, E. (2022). Geospatial solutions for evaluating the impact of the Tigray conflicton farming. Acta Geophys, 70(3), 1285-1299. doi: 10.1007/s11600022-00779-7.
[12] Dmytruk, Y., Cherlinka, V., Cherlinka, L., & Dent, D. (2023). Soils in war and peace. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 80(2), 380-393. doi: 10.1080/00207233.2022.2152254.
[13] Draft Plan for the Recovery of Ukraine. Materials of the working group “Audit of losses incurred as a result of the war”. (2022). The National Council for the Recovery of Ukraine from the Consequences of the War.
[14] EU Soil Strategy for 2030. (2021). Retrieved from https://environment.ec.europa.eu/publications/eu-soilstrategy-2030_en.
[15] Fakhri, F., & Gkanatsios, I. (2021). Integration of Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 data for change detection: A case study in a war conflict area of Mosul city. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment, 22, article number 100505. doi: 10.1016/j.rsase.2021.100505.
[16] Hasab, H.A., Dibs, H., Dawood, A.S., Hadi, W.H., Hussain, H.M., & Al-Ansari, N. (2020). Monitoring and assessment of salinity and chemicals in agricultural lands by a remote sensing technique and soil moisture with chemical index models. Geosciences, 10(6), article number 207. doi: 10.3390/geosciences10060207.
[17] Kalander, E., Abdullah, M.M., & Al-Bakri, J. (2021). The impact of different types of hydrocarbon disturbance on the resiliency of native desert vegetation in a war-affected area: A case study from the state of Kuwait. Plants, 10(9), article number 1945. doi: 10.3390/plants10091945.
[18] Kaplan, G., Aydinli, H.O., Pietrelli, A., Mieyeville, F., & Ferrara, V. (2022). Oil-contaminated soil modeling and remediation monitoring in arid areas using remote sensing. Remote Sensing, 14(10), article number 2500. doi: 10.3390/rs14102500.
[19] Khalil, M., & Satish Kumar, J. (2021). The use of AHP within GIS for destructed areas in Damascus, Syria. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 43(B4-2021), 103-109. doi: 10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B4-2021-103-2021.
[20] Nasibov, A., Shebanina, O., Kormyshkin, I., Gamayunova, V., & Chernova, A. (2024). The impact of war on the fields of Ukraine. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 81(1), 159-168. doi: 10.1080/00207233.2024.2314889.
[21] Pereira, P., Bašić, F., Bogunovic, I., & Barcelo, D. (2022). Russian-Ukrainian war impacts the total environment. Science of the Total Environment, 837, article number 155865. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155865.
[22] Rodrigo-Comino, J., Fernández, J.J.P., & Cerdà, A. (2023). Soil erosion triggered by the archeological excavation and conservation of trenches. The case of “Cerro De Las Trincheras” in Bailén (Jaén, Spain). Cuadernos de Investigación Geográfica (Geographical Research Letters), 49(2), 163-171. doi: 10.18172/cig.5746.
[23] Sentinel Hub EO Browser. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://apps.sentinel-hub.com/eo-browser/.
[24] Shevchuk, S.A., Vyshnevskyi, V.I., & Bilous, O.P. (2022). The use of remote sensing data for investigation of environmental consequences of Russia-Ukraine war. Journal of Landscape Ecology, 15(3), 36-53. doi: 10.2478/ jlecol-2022-0017.
[25] Solokha, M., Pereira, P., Symochko, L., Vynokurova, N., Demyanyuk, O., Sementsova, K., Inacio, M., & Barcelo, D. (2023). Russian-Ukrainian war impacts on the environment. Evidence from the field on soil properties and remote sensing. Science of the Total Environment, 902, article number 166122. doi: 10.1016/j. scitotenv.2023.166122.
[26] Sploditel, A., Golubtsov, O., Chumachenko, S. & Sorokina, L. (2023). The impact of Russia’s war against Ukraine on the state of Ukrainian soils. Results of the analysis. Kyiv: NGO “Ekodiya Center for Environmental Initiatives”.
[27] Trofymchuk, O., Vishnyakov, V., Sheviakina, N., Klymenko, V., & Zahorodnia, S. (2023). Analysis of impacts of war on ecosystems of protected areas Ukraine. Proceedings of 23rd International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2023, 23(3.2), 289-296. doi: 10.5593/sgem2023V/3.2/s14.36.
[28] Via, S.M., & Manley, P.V. (2023). Effects of major munitions compounds on plant health and function. In Plants and their interaction to environmental pollution (pp. 309-332). Amsterdam: Elsevier doi: 10.1016/B978-0-32399978-6.00019-4.
[29] Waga, J.M., & Fajer, M. (2021). The heritage of the Second World War: Bombing in the forests and wetlands of the Koźle Basin. Antiquity, 95(380), 417-434. doi: 10.15184/aqy.2020.154.