Methodological foundations of information support for decision-making in the field of food, environmental, and socio-economic components of national security

Oleg Skydan, Olga Nykolyuk, Petro Pyvovar, Pavlo Topolnytskyi
Download article Read article

Abstract

The negative impact of strategic threats to the development of the state in the context of the development of its national security, in particular food, environmental, and socio-economic components, has intensified in the context of Ukraine's geopolitical challenges. This issue has become particularly acute as a result of open military aggression, which makes it necessary to develop and implement a system of information support for decision-making in the field of national security of Ukraine. Therefore, the purpose of the study is to substantiate methodological foundations of information support of decision-making in the field of national security of Ukraine and their implementation within the framework of the created system, which provides for the collection of information, in particular, using space and geographic information systems, and the use of mathematical modelling and situational analysis methods for data processing. In the course of the research, methods of econometric modelling, structural and functional modelling, and spatial analysis were used. A methodological framework has been developed for decision-making support to address the problems of food, environmental, and socio-economic components of national security. A functional model and algorithm of the decision-making process in the field of national security are constructed and, based on the results obtained, a decision-making system in the field of food, environmental, and socio-economic security is developed. In addition, the study formalises the conceptual provisions of the decision-making support process in the field of national security; a procedure for modelling the country's food security indicators is proposed. Based on the proposed methodological approach, it was determined how much the area of crops decreased due to the temporary occupation and military operations, and the post-war state of fields (minelaying, destruction of crops, equipment, etc.), which allowed forming input data for further projecting of indicators of the development of the agricultural sector and food security in Ukraine, the EU, and the world. The proposed methodological provisions, algorithms, models, and the developed system can be used by state authorities to make managerial decisions on the development of policy in the areas of ensuring food, environmental, and socio-economic security of the country

Keywords

information support; functional modelling; econometric model; information system; management solution; remote sensing of the Earth

[1] Almost a third of Ukrainian fields may be unsown or inaccessible. (2022). Retrieved from https://ecoaction.org.ua/tretyna-poliv-mozhe-buty-nezasiiano.html?fbclid=IwAR1uubhC85qkQnU0SSjBSWvLKfMIUQGSs_ wZbkTMeMiaardKkecTDX1p_DQ.

[2] Bearne, S., Oliker, O., O’Brien, K., & Rathmell, A. (2005). National security decision-making structures and security sector reform. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation.

[3] Beni, L H., Villeneuve, S., LeBlanc, D.I., & Delaquis, P. (2011). A GIS-based approach in support of an assessment of Food Safety Risks. Transactions in GIS, 15(s1), 95-108. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9671.2011.01264.x.

[4] Çolak, E., & Sunar, F. (2020). The importance of ground-truth and crowdsourcing data for the statistical and spatial analyses of the NASA FIRMS active fires in the Mediterranean Turkish forests. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment, 19, article number 100327. doi: 10.1016/j.rsase.2020.100327.

[5] Corn, G.P. (2021). National security decision-making in the age of technology: Delivering outcomes on time and on target. Journal of National Security Law & Policy, 12(61), 61-70.

[6] Fedoniuk, T., Bog, M., Orlov, O., & Appenroth, K. J. (2022). Lemna aequinoctialis migrates further into temperate continental Europe – a new alien aquatic plant for Ukraine. Feddes Repertorium, 133(4), 305-312. doi: 10.1002/fedr.202200001.

[7] Fedoniuk, T., Borsuk, O., Melnychuk, T., Zymaroieva, A., & Pazych, V. (2021). Assessment of the consequences of forest fires in 2020 on the territory of the Chornobyl Radiation and ecological biosphere reserve. Scientific Horizons, 24(8), 26-36. doi: 10.48077/scihor.24(8).2021.26-36.

[8] Freilich, C.D. (2006). National security decision-making in Israel: Processes, pathologies, and strengths. The Middle East Journal, 60(4), 635-663. doi: 10.3751/60.4.11.

[9] Gorbilin, V. (2021). The use of space information in the system of geoinformation support for the adoption of management decisions on issues of national security and defense of Ukraine. Bulletin of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 9, 3-11. doi: 10.15407/visn2021.09.003.

[10] Haß, M. (2022). Liberalising the EU sugar market: What are the effects on Australia and other third countries? Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 66(3), 638-667. doi: 10.1111/1467-8489.12475.

[11] Heazle, M. (2010). Uncertainty in policy making: Values and evidence in complex decisions. London: Earthscan.

[12] Jongeneel, R., & Gonzalez-Martinez, A.R. (2022). The role of market drivers in explaining the EU milk supply after the milk quota abolition. Economic Analysis and Policy, 73, 194-209. doi: 10.1016/j.eap.2021.11.020.

[13] Jongeneel, R., Gonzalez-Martinez, A., & Hoste, R. (2020). An uncertain fate for the EU Pig Sector: Potential Consequences of the 2019 African swine fever outbreak in East Asia. EuroChoices, 20(1), 22-29. doi: 10.1111/1746-692x.12274.

[14] Lant, C.L., Kraft, S.E., Beaulieu, J., Bennett, D., Loftus, T., & Nicklow, J. (2005). Using GIS-based ecologicaleconomic modeling to evaluate policies affecting agricultural watersheds. Ecological Economics, 55(4), 467484. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.12.006.

[15] Liao, K. (2004). Application of RS and GIS ecological environmental dynamic monitoring and management information system. In Proceedings to the 12th International Conference on Geoinformatics – Geospatial Information Research (pp. 607-6014). Sweden: Bridging the Pacific and Atlantic University of Gävle.

[16] Liew, S.C. (2019). Detecting active fires with Himawari-8 geostationary satellite data. In IGARSS 2019 - 2019 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Yokohama: IEEE. doi: 10.1109/igarss.2019.8900195.

[17] Mathenge, M., Sonneveld, B.G., & Broerse, J.E. (2022). Application of GIS in agriculture in promoting evidenceinformed decision making for improving agriculture sustainability: A systematic review. Sustainability, 14(16), article number 9974. doi: 10.3390/su14169974.

[18] Nemec, K.T., & Raudsepp-Hearne, C. (2012). The use of geographic information systems to map and assess ecosystem services. Biodiversity and Conservation, 22(1), 1-15. doi: 10.1007/s10531-012-0406-z.

[19] Nykolyuk, O., Pyvovar, P., Chmil, A., Bogonos, M., Topolnyckyi, P., Cheban, I., & Fellmann, T. (2021). Agricultural markets in Ukraine: Current situation and market outlook until 2030. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. doi: 10.2760/669345.

[20] Orlov, O.O., Fedoniuk, T.P., Iakushenko, D.M., Danylyk, I.M., Kish, R.Y., Zymaroieva, A.A., & Khant, G.A. (2021). Distribution and ecological growth conditions of Utricularia australis R. br. in Ukraine. Journal of Water and Land Development, 48(1-3), 32-47. doi: 10.24425/jwld.2021.136144.

[21] Routray, B.P. (2013). National Security Decision-Making in India. Singapore: S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies.

[22] Salamon, P., Banse, M., Donnellan, T., Haß, M., Jongeneel, R., Laquai, V., Leeuwen, M., Reziti, I., Salputra, G., & Zirngibl, M.-E. (2019). AGMEMOD Outlook for Agricultural and Food Markets in EU Member States 2018-2030. Braunschweig: Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institut.

[23] Skydan, O., Danyk, Yu., Fedinyuk, T., Nykolyuk, O., Pyvovar, P., Bruhno, I., Dankevych, V., Topolnytskyi, P., Vyshnyikov, V., & Yanchevskyi, S. (2022). Space and geoinformation support for decision-making in key areas of national security and defense of Ukraine. Zhytomyr: Polissia National University.

[24] Skydan, O., Fedoniuk, T., Pyvovar, P., Dankevych, V., & Dankevych, Y. (2021). Landscape fire safety management: The experience of Ukraine and the EU. Series of Geology and Technical Sciences, 6(450), 125-132. doi: 10.32014/2021.2518-170x.128.

[25] Vandecandelaere, E., Teyssier, C., Barjolle, D., Jeanneaux, P., & Fournier, S., V, O. (2018). Strengthening sustainable food systems through geographical indications: An analysis of economic impacts. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

[26] Xie, H., Zhu, Z., & He, Y. (2022). Regulation simulation of land-use ecological security, based on a CA model and GIS: A case-study in Xingguo County, China. Land Degradation & Development, 33(10), 1564-1578. doi: 10.1002/ldr.4197.

Skydan, O., Nykolyuk, О., Pyvovar, P., & Topolnytskyi, P. (2023). Methodological foundations of information support for decision-making in the field of food, environmental, and socio-economic components of national security. Scientific Horizons, 26(1), 87-101. https://doi.org/10.48077/scihor.26(1).2023.87-101