Collective bargaining and payment regulation at the pegional level: Assessment and prospects (on the example of Ukraine)

Svitlana Tsymbaliuk, Oksana Poplavska, Natalia Danylevych
Download article Read article

Abstract

In the conditions of constant challenges and threats in the realization of citizens' right to work, collective bargaining becomes almost the only effective tool that allows to reconcile the interests of different actors and consolidate their joint efforts. The purpose of the study is a comparative analysis of the level of development of collective bargaining in different regions of Ukraine and identify challenges and prospects for the development of this institute. The authors proposed a methodology that allows quantitative and qualitative assessment of collective bargaining regulation of wages based on a number of indicators and a comparative analysis of its level of development in different regions. The evaluation confirmed the hypothesis of low activity of social partners and inability to act mobile in the new socio-economic ecosystem. The results showed the underdevelopment of wage regulation through collective bargaining in all regions, which increased distrust in the institution of social partnership and showed the inability of partners to create conditions for decent work. Indicators of the effectiveness of collective bargaining and agreements typical of countries with economies in transition (Ukraine), and the root causes of low quality social dialogue at the regional level are highlighted. Challenges inherent not only in Ukraine but also in most European countries allowed the authors to identify areas for improving collective bargaining, which include expanding the social partners, adapting the content of agreements to the strategic goals of the region and its sustainable development. The identified general trends conditioned upon the challenges of the digital economy and the new economic ecosystem have highlighted the need to rethink the role and content of collective bargaining. The practical value of the study lies in the possibility of applying the developed methodology by social partners, local administrations, local communities to assess social dialogue at the regional level, study and disseminate best practices of wage policy on the basis of social partnership

Keywords

collective bargaining, wages, social dialogue, decent work, evaluation, regional agreements

[1] Addison, J.T., Teixeira, P., Pahnke, A., & Bellmann, L. (2017). The demise of a model? The state of collective bargaining and worker representation in Germany. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 38(2), 193-234.

[2] Amable, B. (2016). The political economy of the neoliberal transformation of French industrial relationsILR Review, 69(3), 523-550.

[3] Bellmann, L., Bossler, M., Gerner, H., & Hübler, O. (2018). Collective bargaining coverage, works councils and the new German minimum wage. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 42(2), 269-288. doi: 10.1177/0143831X18762304.

[4] Burda, N.V., & Chebotaryova, N.M. (2021). Formation and use of labour potential of the Donetsk economic regionEconomic Bulletin of Donbass, 2(64), 53-57.

[5] Brych, V.Ya., & Borysiak, O.V. (2016). The impact of depressed labour markets on enterprise personnel management. Socio-Economic Development of Regions in the Context of International Integration, 21(10), 60-65.

[6] Danylevych, N., & Poplavska, O. (2020). Social responsibility and social partnership in the 4th industrial revolution context: Case of Ukraine. REVESCO. Revista De Estudios Cooperativos, 135, article number e69185.

[7] Doellgast, V., Lillie, N., & Pulignano, V. (2018). Reconstructing solidarity: Labour Unions, precarious work, and the politics of institutional change in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[8] Dustmann, C., Lindner, A., Schönberg, U., Umkehrer, M., & vom Berge, Ph. (2019). Reallocation effects of the minimum wage: Evidence from Germany. Retrieved from http://sarkoups.free.fr/dustmann719.pdf.

[9] Ellguth, P. (2014). Wage effects of work councils and opening clauses: The German case. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 35(1), 95-113. doi: 10.1177/0143831X12463171.

[10] Erickson, C.L., Fisk, C.L., Milkman, R., Mitchell, D.J.B., & Wong, K. (2002). Justice for Janitors in Los Angeles: Lessons from three rounds of negotiationsBritish Journal of Industrial Relations, 40(3), 543-567.

[11] Eurofound. (2020). Industrial relations: Developments 2015-2019. Retrieved from https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/sites/default/files/ef_publication/field_ef_document/ef20023en.pdf.

[12] Global Deal, OECD, & ILO (2020). Social dialogue, skills and COVID-19. The global deal for decent work and inclusive growth flagship report. Retrieved from https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---dcomm/---publ/ documents/publication/wcms_758550.pdf.

[13] Grimshaw, D., Johnson, M., Rubery, J., & Keizer, A. (2016). Reducing precarious work. Protective gaps and the role of social dialogue in Europe. Retrieved from http://documents.manchester.ac.uk/display.aspx?DocID=48958.

[14] Grimshaw, D., Koukiadaki, A., & Tavora, I. (2017). Social dialogue and economic performance: What matters for business. Retrieved from https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_protect/---protrav/---travail/documents/publication/wcms_571914.pdf.

[15] Gumbrell-McCormick, R., & Hyman, R. (2013). Trade unions in Western Europe: Hard times, hard choices. Retrieved from https://oxford.universitypressscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199644414.001.0001/acprof-9780199644414.

[16] Hayter, S., & Jelle, V. (2018). Collective agreements: Extending labour protectionGeneva: ILO.

[17] International Labour Organization. (2018). Quick guide on sources and uses of collective bargaining statistics. Retrieved from https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---stat/documents/publication/wcms_648799.pdf.

[18] Jobert, A. (2005). The territorial social dialogue: Challenges and prospects for the trade unionsTransfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 11(4), 589-604.

[19] Kerckhofs, P. (2019).  European sectoral social dialogue: Facts and figures, Eurofound. Retrieved from https://policycommons.net/artifacts/1845249/european-sectoral-social-dialogue/2590193/.

[20] Kjellberg, A. (2021). The shifting role of unions in the social dialogueEuropean Journal of Workplace Innovation, 6(1-2), 220-244.

[21] Kolot, A., Kozmenko, S., Herasymenko, O., & Štreimikienė, D. (2020). Development of a decent work institute as a social quality imperative: Lessons for UkraineEconomics and Sociology, 13(2), 70-85.

[22] Kolot, A.M., & Pavlovskaya, O.V. (2013). Social partnership as a tool for the formation of consolidated social responsibility: Theoretical principles. Social Economy, 1, 81-90.

[23] Lanchenko, Y.O. (2018). Collective and contractual regulation of social and labor relations in the agricultural sector of the economy: The state and directions of improvement. Demography and Social Economy, 3, 148-160.

[24] Mailand, M., & Due, J. (2004). Social dialogue in Central and Eastern Europe: Present state and future development. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 10(2), 179-197. doi: 10.1177/0959680104044190.

[25] Molina, O. (2021). Industrial relations and social dialogue. Spain: Working life in the COVID-19 pandemic 2020. Dublin: Eurofound.

[26] Motsna, I. (2019). Problems of development of social partnership in Ukraine and ways for their solutionsScientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod National University. Series: International Economic Relations and the World Economy, 25(1), 166-170.

[27] Müller, T., & Hans-Wolfgang, P. (2017). The European trade union federations: Profiles and power resources – changes and challenges in times of crisis. In Rough waters – European trade unions in a time of crisis (pp. 303-329). Brussels: European Trade Union Institute.

[28] Law of Ukraine No. 3356-XII “On Collective Agreements and Contracts”. (1993, July). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3356-12.

[29] Rodríguez, C.J.F., Rojo, R.I., & Lucio, M.M. (2016). Austerity and collective bargaining in Spain: The political and dysfunctional nature of neoliberal deregulationEuropean Journal of Industrial Relations, 22(3), 267-280.

[30] Stanojević, M., Mrčela, A.K., & Breznik, M. (2016). Slovenia at the crossroads: Increasing dependence on supranational institutions and the weakening of social dialogueEuropean Journal of Industrial Relations, 22(3), 281-294.

[31] State Statistics Service of Ukraine. (2020). Retrieved from http://ukrstat.gov.ua.

[32] Stuart, M., & Lucio, M. (2002). Social partnership and the mutual gains organization: Remaking involvement and trust at the British workplace. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 23(2), 177-200.

[33] Tavora, I., & Gonzalez, M.P. (2016). Labour market regulation and collective bargaining in Portugal during the crisis: Continuity and changeEuropean Journal of Industrial Relations, 22(3), 251-265.

[34] Territorial Agreement between Dnipropetrovsk Regional State Administration, Dnipropetrovsk Regional Council, Federation of Employers’ Organizations of the Dnipropetrovsk Region and the Joint Representative Body of Trade Unions of the Dnipropetrovsk Region for 2017-2020. (2017, November). Retrieved from https://www.msp.gov.ua/files/ugody/ter/3-11.pdf.

[35] Territorial Agreement between the Chernihiv regional state administration, trade unions and economic bodies of the region for 2011-2015. (2011, April). Retrieved from https://www.msp.gov.ua/files/ugody/ter/27.pdf.

[36] Territorial Agreement between the Dnipropetrovsk regional state administration, associations (organizations) of employers of the region and the Joint representative body of trade unions of the Dnipropetrovsk region for 2011-2013. (2011, May). Retrieved from https://www.msp.gov.ua/files/ugody/ter/3.pdf.

[37] Territorial Agreement between the Ivano-Frankivsk Regional State Administration, the regional association of employers’ organizations and the Council of Trade Unions of the region for 2016. (2016, May). Retrieved from https://www.msp.gov.ua/files/ugody/ter/8.pdf.

[38] Territorial Agreement between the Ivano-Frankivsk Regional State Administration, the Ivano-Frankivsk Regional Association of Employers’ Organizations and the Council of Trade Unions of the Ivano-Frankivsk Region for 2018-2020. (2018, February). Retrieved from https://www.msp.gov.ua/files/ugody/ter/8-1.pdf.

[39] Territorial Agreement between the Kharkiv Regional State Administration, the Joint Representative Bodies of the Parties of Employers and Trade Unions of the Kharkiv Region for 2013-2015. (2013, April). Retrieved from https://www.msp.gov.ua/files/ugody/ter/22.pdf.

[40] Territorial Agreement between the Kharkiv Regional State Administration, the Joint Representative Bodies of the Parties of Employers and Trade Unions of the Kharkiv Region for 2016-2018. (2016, April). Retrieved from https://www.msp.gov.ua/files/ugody/ter/22-1.pdf.

[41] Territorial Agreement between the Kherson Regional State Administration, the Association of Employers’ Organizations of the Kherson Region, the Kherson Regional Intersectoral Council of Trade Unions on the regulation of basic principles and norms of socio-economic policy and labor relations in the Kherson region for 2019-2021. (2019, August). Retrieved from https://www.msp.gov.ua/files/ugody/ter/23-2.pdf.

[42] Territorial Agreement between the Luhansk regional state administration, the association of employers’ organizations of the Luhansk region and the Federation of Trade Unions of the Luhansk region for 2013-2015. (2013, June). Retrieved from https://www.msp.gov.ua/files/ugody/ter/13.pdf.

[43] Territorial Agreement between the Luhansk Regional State Administration, the Federation of Trade Unions of the Luhansk Region and the Association of Employers’ Organizations of the Luhansk Region and the Federation of Trade Unions of the Luhansk Region for 2019-2020. (2018, December). Retrieved from https://www.msp.gov.ua/files/ugody/ter/13-1.pdf.

[44] Territorial Agreement between the Lviv Regional State Administration, the Lviv Regional Association of Employers’ Organizations and the Trade Unions of the Lviv Region for 2015-2017. (2015, December). Retrieved from https://www.msp.gov.ua/files/ugody/ter/14.pdf.

[45] Territorial Agreement between the Lviv Regional State Administration, the Lviv Regional Association of Employers’ Organizations and the Trade Unions of the Lviv Region for 2018-2020. (2018, June). Retrieved from https://www.msp.gov.ua/files/ugody/ter/14-2.pdf.

[46] Territorial Agreement between the Mykolayiv Regional State Administration, Mykolayiv Regional Council, Mykolayiv Regional Organization of Employers “Industrialists and Entrepreneurs of the Mykolayiv Region” and Mykolayiv Regional Council of Trade Unions 2012-2015 on socio-economic issues. (2012, March). Retrieved from https://www.msp.gov.ua/files/ugody/ter/15.pdf.

[47] Territorial Agreement between the Mykolayiv Regional State Administration, the Mykolayiv Regional Organization of Employers “Industrialists and Entrepreneurs of the Mykolayiv Region” and the Mykolayiv Regional Council of Trade Unions 2017-2020 on the regulation of socio-economic issues. (2017, April). Retrieved from https://www.msp.gov.ua/files/ugody/ter/15-1.pdf.

[48] Territorial Agreement between the Sumy Oblast Authority, the Joint Representative of the Sumy Oblast Trade Union Party and the Sumy Oblast Employers’ Joint Representative Body for 2017-2018. (2017, May). Retrieved from https://www.msp.gov.ua/files/ugody/ter/20-1.PDF.

[49] Territorial Agreement between Vinnytsia Regional State Administration, Vinnytsia Regional Council, employers’ organization and the Federation of Trade Unions of the Vinnytsia Region for 2011-2015. (2011, April). Retrieved from https://www.msp.gov.ua/files/ugody/ter/1.doc.

[50] Territorial Agreement between Vinnytsia Regional State Administration, Vinnytsia Regional Council, Vinnytsia Regional Association of Employers’ Organizations and the Joint Representative Body of Trade Unions of the Vinnytsia Region for 2016-2020. (2016, November). Retrieved from https://www.msp.gov.ua/files/ugody/ter/1-1.doc.

[51] Territorial Agreement on cooperation between the Sumy regional association of employers’ organizations and the Sumy regional council of trade unions for 2019-2021. (2019, August). Retrieved from https://www.msp.gov.ua/ files/ugody/ter/20-3.pdf.

[52] Territorial Agreement on the regulation of basic socio-economic principles and labor relations for 2017-2020 between the authorities – Chernihiv Regional State Administration, Chernihiv Regional Council, employers and entrepreneurs – Regional Association of Employers’ Organizations, Joint Representative Body of Employers and Employers of Chernihiv – Joint representative body of representative trade unions at the territorial level. (2017, October). Retrieved from https://www.msp.gov.ua/files/ugody/ter/27-1.pdf.

[53] Territorial Agreement on the regulation of the basic principles and norms of implementation of socio-economic policy and labor relations in the Kherson region for 2017-2018. (2017, January). Retrieved from https://www.msp. gov.ua/files/ugody/ter/23-1.pdf.

[54] The actual subsistence level in 2015-2020. (2020). Retrieved from https://www.msp.gov.ua/news/12286.html.

[55] Tørres, L. (2021). Social dialogue as a tool to fight inequality & recover after a pandemic. New York: New York University.

[56] Tsymbaliuk, S., & Shkoda, T. (2022). Labour remuneration in the healthcare sector of Ukraine in terms of decent work concept. Employee Relations, 44(1), 191-209. doi: 10.1108/ER-10-2020-0477.

[57] Tsymbaliuk, S., Wyrwa, D., & Shkoda, T. (2019). Remuneration policy in terms of decent work at a regional levelProblems and Perspectives in Management, 17(4), 80-92.

[58] Villanueva, E. (2015). Employment and wage effects of extending collective bargaining agreements. IZA World of Labor, 136, 1-10.

[59] Volkova, N.V., & Kuznetsova, J.V. (2018). Social partnership as a factor of economic stability in UkraineEconomics and Management of the National Economy, 25, 67-73.

Tsymbaliuk, S., Poplavska, O., & Danylevych, N. (2022). Collective bargaining and payment regulation at the pegional level: Assessment and prospects (on the example of Ukraine). Scientific Horizons, 25(1), 76-95. https://doi.org/10.48077/scihor.25(1).2022.76-95