Impact of anthropogenic factors on the population structure of non-fish seafood in reservoirs of Azerbaijan

Farida Guliyeva, Sanubar Guliyeva, Ayla Bilgin, Lala Guliyeva
Received: 22.11.2024 Revised: 01.05.2025 Accepted: 28.05.2025
Retrieved from Vol. 28, No. 6, 2025 Pages: 23-35
Download article Read article

Abstract

The aim of the study was to establish the impact of anthropogenic factors on population size and structure. The article presented the results of a comprehensive empirical study aimed at assessing the influence of anthropogenic factors on the structure and abundance of shrimp (Palaemon elegans, Palaemon adspersus) and freshwater crayfish (Astacus leptodactylus, Pontastacus eichwaldi) populations in the conditions of Shamkir and Mingachevir reservoirs of Azerbaijan. In the period from June to August 2024, field surveys were conducted at sites with different degrees of pollution. The assessment included analyses of the density of individuals, age and sex composition, juvenile abundance and mortality, and spatial distribution of populations. For freshwater crayfish, the average density of Astacus leptodactylus ranged from 12 individuals/m2 (clean zones of the Shamkir reservoir) to 5 individuals/m2 (polluted zones of the Mingachevir reservoir). The number of Pontastacus eichwaldi varied from 7 to 2 individuals/m2 . The share of juveniles in the population structure in clean areas reached 42% (Palaemon elegans) and 40% (Astacus leptodactylus), while in polluted areas it decreased to 15-20%. Mortality of juveniles up to 40% was recorded in sites with organic pollution. An imbalance in the sex composition was observed in areas with high levels of pollution: in Palaemon adspersus and Pontastacus eichwaldi the proportion of males exceeded 55%, while in clean areas females predominated or an equal ratio was maintained. The greatest decrease in the abundance of all species was observed in the Mingachevir reservoir – up to 60% for Pontastacus eichwaldi, which indicates the high sensitivity of the species to complex anthropogenic impact. The results showed that chemical pollution, recreational load and poaching are the determining factors of population degradation. A direct correlation between the level of anthropogenic impact and the decrease in abundance, disturbance of age and sex structure was established. Indicator indicators for monitoring the state of freshwater ecosystems were proposed. The obtained results can be used for development of monitoring programmes and ecological-restoration measures in aquatic ecosystems of Azerbaijan

Keywords

bottom invertebrates; monitoring of environment; technogenic load; freshwater ecosystems; bioindication

  1. Abbasov, R., Karimov, R., & Jafarova, N. (2022). Ecosystem services in Azerbaijan. Cham: Springer. doi: 10.1007/9783-031-08770-7.
  2. Amoah, K., Cai, J., Huang, Y., Wang, B., Shija, V.M., Wang, Z., Jin, X., Cai, S., Lu, Y., & Jian, J. (2024). Identification and characterization of four Bacillus species from the intestine of hybrid grouper (Epinephelus fuscoguttatus♀× E. lanceolatus♂), their antagonistic role on common pathogenic bacteria, and effects on intestinal health. Fish & Shellfish Immunology, 152, article number 109795. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2024.109795.
  3. Anyanwu, O.A., Folta, S.C., Zhang, F.F., Chui, K., Chomitz, V.R., Kartasurya, M.I., & Naumova, E.N. (2023). Fish – to eat or not to eat? A mixed-methods investigation of the conundrum of fish consumption in the context of marine pollution in Indonesia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(8), article number 5582. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20085582.
  4. Backovi , D.D., & Tokodi, N. (2024). Blue revolution turning green? A global concern of cyanobacteria and cyanotoxins in freshwater aquaculture: A literature review. Journal of Environmental Management, 360, article number 121115. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121115.
  5. Baird, I.G., & Hogan, Z.S. (2023). Hydropower Dam development and fish biodiversity in the Mekong River Basin: A review. Water, 15(7), article number 1352. doi: 10.3390/w15071352.
  6. Bilyalov, Y., Myrzhiyeva, A., Tokayev, Z., Akhmetzhanova, A., Suleimenov, S., Moltabayeva, A., & Muratbayev, D. (2025). Indication of radioactive contamination (Cs137, Sr90) in freshwater fish of the Irtysh River, Kazakhstan. Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Biology and Fisheries, 29(1), 2177-2185. doi: 10.21608/ ejabf.2025.412104.
  7. Colombo, S.M., et al. (2023). Towards achieving circularity and sustainability in feeds for farmed blue foods. Reviews in Aquaculture, 15(3), 1115-1141. doi: 10.1111/raq.12766.
  8. Febriana, A., & Utary, B.I. (2024). The impact of mangrove forest land conversion on the sustainability of biological resources and the environment of Tanjung Luar village. Justitia Jurnal Hukum, 8(1). doi: 10.30651/ justitia.v8i1.20447.
  9. Gaja-Svasti, S., Baird, I.G., & Manorom, K. (2022). The value of wild fish: Diet and livelihoods in two rural villages in the Mun River Basin, northeastern Thailand. South East Asia Research, 30(3), 287-307. doi: 10.1080/0967828X.2022.2118621.
  10. Guidelines for the treatment of animals in behavioural research and teaching. (2012). Animal Behaviour, 83(1), 301-309. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.10.031.
  11. Gulieva, F.R., & Gulieva, L.V. (2021). Ecological peculiarities and food spectrum research of non-fish water products in Mingachavir and Varvara reservoirs in Azerbaijan. Caspian Journal of Environmental Sciences, 19(4), 723-729. doi: 10.22124/cjes.2021.5146.
  12. Hasanova, S. (2024). Challenges and sustainable solutions for the fisheries industry in Azerbaijan. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/385141912_Challenges_and_Sustainable_Solutions_for_the_ Fisheries_Industry_in_Azerbaijan.
  13. Jubb, W.M., et al. (2023). Catchment-wide interactive effects of anthropogenic structures and river levels on fish spawning migrations. Anthropocene, 43, article number 100400. doi: 10.1016/j.ancene.2023.100400.
  14. Khudiiash, Yu., Potrokhov, O., Zinkovskyi, O., Vodianitskyi, O., Kofonov, K., & Krasiuk, Yu. (2023). Biotesting of the anthropogenic impact on areas of the r. Ros and r. Protoka on the viability of carp fish eggs and larvae. Scientific Reports of the National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, 19(6). doi: 10.31548/ dopovidi6(106).2023.003.
  15. Koretsky, V., & Kononenko, I. (2024). Study of technological aspects of Procambarus clarkii cultivation in terms of ensuring their welfare. Animal Science and Food Technology, 15(3), 45-57. doi: 10.31548/animal.3.2024.45.
  16. Kurovska, A. (2024). Eutrophication of the Kyiv reservoir of Ukraine: Review. Biological Systems: Theory and Innovation, 15(1), 61-72. doi: 10.31548/biologiya15(1).2024.005.
  17. Mamun, A.A., Murray, F.J., Sprague, M., McAdam, B.J., Roos, N., de Roos, B., Pounds, A., & Little, D.C. (2021). Exportdriven, extensive coastal aquaculture can benefit nutritionally vulnerable people. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 5, article number 713140. doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2021.713140.
  18. Mayer, I., & Pšenička, M. (2024). Conservation of teleost fishes: Application of reproductive technologies. Theriogenology Wild, 4, article number 100078. doi: 10.1016/j.therwi.2024.100078.
  19. Miao, X., Guo, H., Song, Y., Du, C., Feng, J., Tao, Y., Xu, H., & Li, Y. (2023). Improvement of flesh quality of farmed silver carp (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix) by short-term stocked in natural water. Fishes, 8(3), article number 142. doi: 10.3390/fishes8030142.
  20. Mutethya, E., & Yongo, E. (2021). A comprehensive review of invasion and ecological impacts of introduced common carp (Cyprinus carpio) in Lake Naivasha, Kenya. Lakes & Reservoirs: Research & Management, 26(4), article number e12386. doi: 10.1111/lre.12386.
  21. Pandit, D., Shefat, S.H., & Kunda, M. (2023). Fish diversity decline threatens small-scale fisheries in the Haor Basin of Bangladesh. Retrieved from http://toobigtoignore.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Pandit-etal_s.pdf.
  22. Pšeničková, T., & Horák, J. (2022). Influence of forest landscape on birds associated with lowland water bodies. Forest Ecology and Management, 513, article number 120199. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2022.120199.
  23. Rahayu, S., Amoah, K., Huang, Y., Cai, J., Wang, B., Shija, V.M., Jin, X., Anokyewaa, M.A., & Jiang, M. (2024). Probiotics application in aquaculture: Its potential effects, current status in China and future prospects. Frontiers in Marine Science, 11, article number 1455905. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2024.1455905.
  24. Reverter, M., Vega-Heredia, S., & Warburton, P.J. (2025). Historical perspective and contribution of aquaculture to the AMR global pandemic. In P. Elumalai & S. Lakshmi (Eds.), Antimicrobial resistance in aquaculture and aquatic environments (pp. 17-38). Singapore: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-981-97-7320-6_2.
  25. Sarker, F.C., Rahman, M.K., Sadat, A., Shahriar, A., & Alam, A.K. (2022). Haor-based floodplain-rich freshwater ichthyofauna in Sylhet division, Bangladesh: Species availability, diversity, and conservation perspectives. Conservation, 2(4), 639-661. doi: 10.3390/conservation2040042.
  26. Sehnal, L., Brammer-Robbins, E., Wormington, A.M., Blaha, L., Bisesi, J., Larkin, I., Martyniuk, C.J., Simonin, M., & Adamovsky, O. (2021). Microbiome composition and function in aquatic vertebrates: Small organisms making big impacts on aquatic animal health. Frontiers in Microbiology, 12, article number 567408. doi: 10.3389/ fmicb.2021.567408.
  27. Shumka, S., Lalaj, S., Šanda, R., Shumka, L., & Meulenbroek, P. (2023). Recent data on the distribution of freshwater ichthyofauna in Albania. Ribarstvo, Croatian Journal of Fisheries, 81(1), 33-44. doi: 10.2478/cjf-20230004.
  28. Shumka, S., Shumka, L., Trajce, K., & Ceci, S. (2020). First record of the Western Greece goby - Economidichthys pygmaeus (Holly, 1929), in Greater Prespa Lake (Albania). Ecologica Montenegrina, 35, 78-81. doi: 10.37828/ EM.2020.35.6.
  29. Sogbanmu, T.O., & Dauda, A.B. (2024). Native Nigerian fish species used as models in ecotoxicological studies: A rapid systematic review. In Fish species in environmental risk Assessment strategies (pp. 134-161). Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry. doi: 10.1039/9781837673711-00134.
  30. Tacon, A.G., Coelho, R.T., Levy, J., Machado, T.M., Neiva, C.R., & Lemos, D. (2024). Annotated bibliography of selected papers dealing with the health benefits and risks of fish and seafood consumption. Reviews in Fisheries Science & Aquaculture, 32(2), 211-305. doi: 10.1080/23308249.2023.2238821.
  31. Thorstensen, M.J., Vandervelde, C.A., Bugg, W.S., Michaleski, S., Vo, L., Mackey, T.E., Lawrence, M.J., & Jeffries, K.M. (2022). Non-lethal sampling supports integrative movement research in freshwater fish. Frontiers in Genetics, 13, article number 795355. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.795355.
  32. Van Driessche, C., Everts, T., Neyrinck, S., Halfmaerten, D., Verschelde, P., Breine, J., Bonte, D., & Brys, R. (2024). Environmental DNA metabarcoding reflects spatiotemporal fish community shifts in the Scheldt estuary. Science of the Total Environment, 934, article number 173242. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173242.
  33. Vieira, H.C., de Abreu, S.N., & Morgado, F. (2022). Field caging transplants of fish for assessment and monitoring in aquatic toxicology. In W.L. Filho, A.M. Azul, L. Brandli, A.L. Salvia & T. Wall (Eds.), Life below water (pp. 377391). Cham: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-98536-7_76.
  34. Waldock, C., et al. (2025). Micronutrient levels of global tropical reef fish communities differ from fisheries capture. People and Nature, 7(1), 32-51. doi: 10.1002/pan3.10736.
  35. Wanjari, R.N., Shah, T.H., Telvekar, P., Bhat, F.A., Abubakr, A., Bhat, B.A., Darve, S.I., Ramteke, K.K., Mathialagan, D., Magloo, A.H., & Singh, B.S. (2024). Assessing ecosystem health: A preliminary investigation of the gosikhurd dam ecosystem structure and functioning, an appraisal based on ecological modelling, India. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 196(9), article number 815. doi: 10.1007/s10661-024-12958-8.
  36. Zanghi, C., & Ioannou, C.C. (2025). The impact of increasing turbidity on the predator – prey interactions of freshwater fishes. Freshwater Biology, 70(1), article number e14354. doi: 10.1111/fwb.14354.
  37. Zhang, L., Zhou, W., Jiao, M., Xie, T., Xie, M., Li, H., Suo, A., Yue, W., Ding, D., & He, W. (2024). Use of passive sampling in environmental DNA metabarcoding technology: Monitoring of fish diversity in the Jiangmen coastal waters. Science of The Total Environment, 908, article number 168298. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168298.
Guliyeva, F., Guliyeva, S., Bilgin, A., & Guliyeva, L. (2025). Impact of anthropogenic factors on the population structure of non-fish seafood in reservoirs of Azerbaijan. Scientific Horizons, 28(6), 23-35. https://doi.org/10.48077/scihor6.2025.23