Soil organic matter transformation under the influence of microbial agents and tillage in grain and oil crops in Southern Ukraine

Iryna Bidnyna, Pavlo Lykhovyd, Pavlo Pysarenko, Maiia Hetman, Gennadiy Karashchuk
Download article Read article

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of microbial agents in decomposing organic residues under different tillage practices in southern Ukraine from 2016 to 2020. Conducted at the Institute of Climate-Smart Agriculture, the research focused on dark-chestnut soil in a rainfed crop rotation involving winter wheat, grain sorghum, spring barley, sunflower, and a fallow field. Two factors were examined: microbial preparations and tillage (ploughing vs. ploughless). The Ecostern preparation, containing various bacterial strains and Trichoderma fungi, significantly accelerated winter wheat straw decomposition, achieving 45.9%-63.6% degradation within 90 days, a 31.4% increase over the control. The preparation Organic Balance, comprising Bacillus subtilis and other bacterial strains, maximised barley straw degradation at 80.1%. Sunflower residue mineralisation increased by 48.0%-55.5% with microbial treatments. These preparations also enhanced soil humus content by 0.06%-0.09%. The improved soil nutrient regime led to sorghum yield increases of 12.8%-45.3%, varying with tillage method. Spring barley yielded a maximum of 2.25 t/ha under ploughing with Organic Balance. Sunflower seed yields rose by 0.1-0.22 t/ha with ploughing. The accelerated organic matter transformation boosted soil biological activity, contributing to ecological sustainability. Ammonifying and nitrifying microorganism counts were highest with Ecostern and Organic Balance under shallow ploughless tillage, ranging from 19.82-25.87 and 7.31-12.76 CFU, respectively. Overall, the microbial preparations improved the soil’s nutrient regime, resulting in significant increases in crop yields

Keywords

agroecosystem; cellulose decomposer; crop rotation; microorganisms; productivity; soil fertility; sustainability

  1. Aasfar, A., Bargaz, A., Yaakoubi, K., Hilali, A., Bennis, I., Zeroual, Y., & Kadmiri, I.M. (2021). Nitrogen fixing Azotobacter species as potential soil biological enhancers for crop nutrition and yield stability. Frontiers in Microbiology, 12, article number 628379. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.628379.
  2. Agbangba, C.E., Aide, E.S., Honfo, H., & Kakai, R.G. (2024). On the use of post-hoc tests in environmental and biological sciences: A critical review. Heliyon, 10(3), article number e25131. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024. e25131.
  3. Ampt, E.A., van Ruijven, J., Raaijmakers, J.M., Termorshuizen, A.J., & Mommer, L. (2019). Linking ecology and plant pathology to unravel the importance of soil-borne fungal pathogens in species-rich grasslands. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 154, 141-156. doi: 10.1007/s10658-018-1573-x.
  4. Angon, P.B., Anjum, N., Akter, M.M., KC, S., Suma, R.P., & Jannat, S. (2023). An overview of the impact of tillage and cropping systems on soil health in agricultural practices. Advances in Agriculture, 2023(1), article number 8861216. doi: 10.1155/2023/8861216.
  5. Bidnyna, I., Shkoda, O., Tomnytskyi, A., Borovik, V., & Sharii, V. (2021). Patterns of soil processes on dark chestnut soil under conditions of its use in the conditions of the steppe of Ukraine. Journal of the Polytechnic of Rijeka, 9(1), 423-439. doi: 10.31784/zvr.9.1.26.
  6. Bohdan, M., Huliaieva, H., Patyka, M., Kalinichenko, A., Patyka, V., & Maksin, V. (2021). Enhancement of wheat virus-resistance at application of the se nanoparticles citrates and consortium of soil microorganisms. Agriculture and Forestry, 67(1), 63-72. doi: 10.17707/AgricultForest.67.1.05.
  7. Chandra, H., Kumari, P., Bisht, R., Prasad, R., & Yadav, S. (2020). Plant growth promoting Pseudomonas aeruginosa from Valeriana wallichii displays antagonistic potential against three phytopathogenic fungi. Molecular Biology Reports, 47, 6015-6026. doi: 10.1007/s11033-020-05676-0.
  8. Convention on Biological Diversity. (1992, June). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/ show/995_030#Text.
  9. DSTU 4114:2002. (2003). Soils. Determination of mobile phosphorus and potassium compounds by the modified Machigin method. Retrieved from https://online.budstandart.com/ua/catalog/doc-page?id_doc=58928.
  10. DSTU 4289:2004. (2005). Soil quality. Methods for determining organic matter. Retrieved from https://online. budstandart.com/ua/catalog/doc-page.html?id_doc=56400.
  11. DSTU ISO 11261:2001. (2003). Soil quality. Determination of total nitrogen content. Modified Kjeldahl method (ISO 11261:1995, IDT). Retrieved from https://online.budstandart.com/ua/catalog/doc-page?id_doc=58935.
  12. DSTU ISO 11465:2001. (2003). Soil quality. Determination of dry matter and water content by mass. Gravimetric method (ISO 11465:1993, IDT). Retrieved from https://surl.li/rieari.
  13. Dudchenko, V., Markovska, O.Y., & Sydiakina, O. (2021). Soybean productivity in rice crop rotation depending on the impact of biodestructor on post-harvest rice residues. Ecological Engineering & Environmental Technology, 22(6), 114-121. doi: 10.12912/27197050/141466.
  14. Fomenko, V., & Kaziuta, A. (2023). Influence of biodestructor on decomposition of crop residues and humus condition of typical chernozem. Scientific Papers. Series A. Agronomy, 66(1), 69-74.
  15. Honchar, A., Tonkha, O., Patyka, N., Lykholat, Y., & Patyka, T. (2021). Morphological and physiological-biochemical variability of spore-forming bacteria isolated from the agrocoenosis of winter wheat. Regulatory Mechanisms in Biosystems, 12(4), 588-593. doi: 10.15421/022180.
  16. Horodyska, I.M., Ternovyi, Y., Chub, A., Lishchuk, A., & Draga, M. (2021). Technologies of protection and nutrition in agrophytocenoses of legumes for organic seed production. Environmental Research, Engineering and Management, 77(1), 47-58. doi: 10.5755/j01.erem.77.1.23459.
  17. Jansson, J.K., & Hofmockel, K.S. (2020). Soil microbiomes and climate change. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 18, 35-46. doi: 10.1038/s41579-019-0265-7.
  18. Karkanis, P.G. (1983). Determining field capacity and wilting point using soil saturation by capillary rise. Canadian Agricultural Engineering, 25, 19-21.
  19. Khomenko, T., Tonkha, O., & Pikovska, O. (2023). Humus and nitrogen content of sod-podzolic soil under the influence of biopreparations for potato cultivation. Plant and Soil Science, 14(1), 82-95. doi: 10.31548/ plant1.2023.82.
  20. Kovalenko, O. (2023). Influence of growing elements on spring barley productivity in the northern steppe of Ukraine. The Scientific Heritage, 117, 3-9. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8176770.
  21. Kovalenko, О. (2022). Influence of stubble biodegrader ecostern on microbiological parameters of soil under different cultivation. Grail of Science, 20, 72-75. doi: 10.36074/grail-of-science.30.09.2022.011.
  22. Kuts, O., Kokoiko, V., Paramonova, T., Mykhailyn, V., & Syromiatnykov, Y. (2022). Influence of the fertiliser system on the soil nutrient regime and onion productivity. Plant and Soil Science, 13(4), 17-26. doi: 10.31548/ agr.13(4).2022.17-26.
  23. Li, Y., Zhang, Q., Cai, Y., Yang, Q., & Chang, S.X. (2020). Minimum tillage and residue retention increase soil microbial population size and diversity: Implications for conservation tillage. Science of the Total Environment, 716, article number 137164. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137164.
  24. Okorie, B.O., & Niraj, Y. (2022). Effects of different tillage practices on soil fertility properties: A review. International Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Research, 8(1), 176-193. doi: 10.51193/IJAER.2022.8112.
  25. Panfilova, A. (2021). Influence of stubble biodestructor on soil microbiological activity and grain yield of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Notulae Scientia Biologicae, 13(4), article number 11035. doi: 10.15835/ nsb13411035.
  26. Panfilova, А., & Byelov, Y. (2022). The influence of the stubble biodestroyer and the main tillage method on the nutrient regime of the soil. Ukrainian Black Sea Region Agrarian Science, 26(3), 47-54. doi: 10.56407/2313092X/2022-26(3)-4.
  27. Pleissner, D. (2020). Chances and challenges of the biologization of the economy of rural areas. Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry, 23, 46-49. doi: 10.1016/j.cogsc.2020.02.008.
  28. Pylak, M., Oszust, K., & Frąc, M. (2019). Review report on the role of bioproducts, biopreparations, biostimulants and microbial inoculants in organic production of fruit. Reviews in Environmental Science and Biotechnology, 18, 597-616. doi: 10.1007/s11157-019-09500-5.
  29. Rajan, S.S.S., & Upsdell, M.P. (2021). Environmentally friendly agronomically superior alternatives to chemically processed phosphate fertilizers: Phosphate rock/sulfur/Acidithiobacillus sp. combinations. Advances in Agronomy, 167, 183-245. doi: 10.1016/bs.agron.2021.01.001.
  30. Ronga, D., Biazzi, E., Parati, K., Carminati, D., Carminati, E., & Tava, A. (2019). Microalgal biostimulants and biofertilisers in crop productions. Agronomy, 9(4), article number 192. doi: 10.3390/agronomy9040192.
  31. Rowińska, P., Gutarowska, B., Janas, R., & Szulc, J. (2024). Biopreparations for the decomposition of crop residues. Microbial Biotechnology, 17(8), article number e14534. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.14534.
  32. Singh, P.K., & Chudasama, H. (2021). Pathways for climate change adaptations in arid and semi-arid regions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 284, article number 124744. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124744.
  33. Stamenković, S., Beškoski, V., Karabegović, I., Lazić, M., & Nikolić, N. (2018). Microbial fertilizers: A comprehensive review of current findings and future perspectives. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 16(1), article number e09R01. doi: 10.5424/sjar/2018161-12117.
  34. Szostek, M., Szpunar-Krok, E., Pawlak, R., Stanek-Tarkowska, J., & Ilek, A. (2022). Effect of different tillage systems on soil organic carbon and enzymatic activity. Agronomy, 12(1), article number 208. doi: 10.3390/ agronomy12010208.
  35. Teklu, A., Simane, B., & Bezabih, M. (2024). Climate smart agriculture impact on food and nutrition security in Ethiopia. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 7, article number 1079426. doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2023.1079426.
  36. Thapa, B., Pande, K.R., Khanal, B., & Marahatta, S. (2018). Effect of tillage, residue management and cropping system on the properties of soil. International Journal of Applied Sciences and Biotechnology, 6(2), 164-168. doi: 10.3126/ijasbt.v6i2.20433.
  37. Wu, P., et al. (2021). Agronomic system for stabilizing wheat yields and enhancing the sustainable utilization of soil: A 12-year in-situ rotation study in a semi-arid agro-ecosystem. Journal of Cleaner Production, 329, article number 129768. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129768.
Bidnyna, I., Lykhovyd, P., Pysarenko, P., Hetman, M., & Karashchuk, G. (2025). Soil organic matter transformation under the influence of microbial agents and tillage in grain and oil crops in Southern Ukraine. Scientific Horizons, 28(5), 9-19. https://doi.org/10.48077/scihor5.2025.09