Practical aspects of environmental assessment of water bodies transformation

Liudmyla Arkhypova, Marta Korchemlyuk, Hanna Rashevska, Ihor Vynnychenko, Inna Tyshchuk
Received: 12.02.2025 Revised: 03.04.2025 Accepted: 30.04.2025
Retrieved from Vol. 28, No. 5, 2025 Pages: 65-78
Download article Read article

Abstract

One of the components of the environmental assessment of the state of transformation of surface water bodies is hydromorphological assessment, which has recently been applied in Ukraine as a necessary component of the implementation of the implemented international environmental legislation. The aim of the article was to provide a practical application of hydromorphological assessment methods on the example of two objects with artificially constructed structures. The hydromorphological assessment was carried out according to a certified methodology developed by the Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Institute of the State Emergency Service of Ukraine and the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. A number of hydromorphological indicators were monitored according to the methodology. The hydromorphological assessment included field surveys of each water body, database development, including mapping, digitisation of the results and preparation of reports. From 09 to 24 September 2024, experts surveyed two unnamed streams of the IV and V orders of the Danube River basin within the settlements of Karapachiv and Nova Slobidka in the Vyzhnytsia and Dniester districts of Chernivtsi Oblast. Based on the results of the survey and analysis of the studied indicators using environmental assessment methods that comply with the European Union Water Framework Directive, such criteria as river continuity and runoff correspond to the lowest assessment for both sites. Taking into account the principle of European water legislation, according to which a criterion indicating that there is a risk of a surface water body not achieving good ecological status automatically places it in the “at risk” category. Therefore, hydromorphological assessment is critical for integrated river basin management, implementation of action programmes, in particular, to restore the free flow of watercourses and ensure conditions for maintaining their good ecological status and potential. The study further developed the practice of environmental assessment of water body transformation

Keywords

European Union Water Framework Directive; Danube River Basin; surface water body; risk criteria; hydromorphological assessment

  1. Arkhypova, L., Vinnychenko, I., Kinash, I., Horoshkova, L., & Khlobystov, Ie. (2022). Theoretical substantiation of modeling of recreational systems. Ecological Engineering & Environmental Technology, 23(5), 99-108. doi: 10.12912/27197050/151758.
  2. Arulbalaji, P., Padmalal, D., & Sreelash, K. (2019). GIS and AHP techniques based delineation of groundwater potential zones: A case study from Southern Western Ghats, India. Scientific Reports, 9(1), article number 2082. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-38567-x.
  3. Avdullahi, S., & Hajra, A. (2023). Identification of groundwater potential zones using remote sensing, geographical information system, and analytic hierarchy process techniques – a case study in the Nerodime Watershed, Kosovo. Ecological Engineering & Environmental Technology, 24(4), 147-161. doi: 10.12912/27197050/161887.
  4. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. (2000). Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/ eli/dir/2000/60/oj/eng.
  5. European Environment Agency. (2025). Water exploitation index plus. Retrieved from https://surl.li/hwbirj.
  6. Feher, J., et al. (2012). Hydromorphological alterations and pressures in European rivers, lakes, transitional and coastal waters: Thematic assessment for EEA water 2012 report. Prague: ETC.
  7. Garbowski, T., Brysiewicz, A., Nosek, J., Bar-Michalczyk, D., & Czerniejewski, P. (2023). An analysis of hydromorphological index for rivers (HIR) model components, based on a hydromorphological assessment of watercourses in the Central European plain. Environmental Management, 72, 437-455 doi: 10.1007/s00267022-01778-6.
  8. Glibovytska, N., Rashevska, H., Arkhypova, L., Adamenko, Y., & Orfanova, M. (2024). Impact of electric power facilities on natural phytocenotic diversity. Ukrainian Journal of Forest and Wood Science, 15(2), 8-22. doi: 10.31548/forest/2.2024.08.
  9. Gomelia, N., Trokhymenko, G., Hlushko, O., & Shabliy, T. (2018). Electroextraction of heavy metals from wastewater for the protection of natural water bodies from pollution. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1(10(91), 55-61. doi: 10.15587/1729-4061.2018.123929.
  10. Guidance document addressing hydromorphology and physico-chemistry for a pressure-impact analysis / risk assessment according to the EU WFD. (2014) Austria: EPIRB Project Activity.
  11. Hirschnitz-Garbers, M., Araujo, S.A., & Hinzmann, M. (2022). Exploring perspectives on climate-resource-nexus policies: Barriers and relevance in different world regions. Journal of Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems, 10(3), article number 1090408. doi: 10.13044/j.sdewes.d9.0408.
  12. Hydromorphological assessment 2019 in the Ros River basin (Middle Dnipro region): Technical project report (ENI/2016/372-403). (2019). Vienna: EUWI+ Project.
  13. Khilchevskyi, V., & Karamushka, V. (2022). Global water resources: Distribution and demand. In Clean water and sanitation. Encyclopedia of the UN sustainable development goals (pp. 1-11). Berlin: Springer. doi: 10.1007/9783-319-70061-8_101-1.
  14. Khilchevskyi, V., Grebin, V., Dubniak, S., Zabokrytska, M., & Bolbot, H. (2022). Large and small reservoirs of Ukraine. Journal of Water and Land Development, 52(1-3), 101-107. doi: 10.24425/jwld.2022.140379.
  15. Kijowska-Strugala, M., Wiejaczka, L., Cebulski, J., Placzkowska, E., Raczkowska, Z., Prokop, P., Zou, Q., Guo, Y., & Hu, J. (2021). Assessment of the naturalness and anthropogenic transformation of the habitats of small mountain streams in different climate zones. Environmental Earth Sciences, 80, article number 267. doi: 10.1007/s12665021-09552-3.
  16. Kinash, I., Shtogryn, H., Sakal, O., & Zapukhliak, I. (2019). The ecologization of housing and communal services of Ukraine in the context of sustainable development. Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research, 6(1), 113-130. doi: 10.15549/jeecar.v6i1.251.
  17. Klymchuk, I., Matiyiv, K., Arkhypova, L., & Korchemlyuk, M. (2022). Mountain tourist destination – the quality of groundwater sources. Ecological Engineering & Environmental Technology, 23(3), 208-214. doi: 10.12912/27197050/147764.
  18. Kolesnik, V., Borysovska, O., Pavlychenko, A., & Shirin, A. (2017). Determination of trends and regularities of occurrence of emergency situations of technogenic and natural character in Ukraine. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu, 6, 124-131.
  19. Kopei, V., Onysko, O., & Panchuk, V. (2020). Principles of development of product lifecycle management system for threaded connections based on the Python programming language. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1426, article number 012033. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1426/1/012033.
  20. Kopei, V., Onysko, O., Barz, C., Dasic, P., & Panchuk, V. (2023). Designing a multi-agent PLM system for threaded connections using the principle of isomorphism of regularities of complex systems. Machines, 11(2), article number 263. doi: 10.3390/machines11020263.
  21. Korchemlyuk, M., & Arkhypova, L. (2016). Environmental audit of Ukrainian basin ecosystem of the Prut river Naukovyi. Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu, 5, 98-106.
  22. Kravchynskyi, R.L., Khilchevskyi, V.K., Korchemluk, M.V., Arkhypova, L.M., & Plichko, L.V. (2021). Criteria for identification of landslides in the upper Prut River basin on satellite images. Geoinformatics, 2021, 1-6. doi: 10.3997/2214-4609.20215521003.
  23. Kupferschmidt, C., Binns, A.D., Kupferschmidt, K.L., & Taylor, G.W. (2024). Stable rivers: A case study in the application of text-to-image generative models for Earth sciences. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 49(13), 4213-4232. doi: 10.1002/esp.5961.
  24. Mandryk, O.M., Mishchuk, B., Zelmanovych, A.I., Tuts, O.M., & Poberezhna, L. (2021). Investigation of the process of mud filtrate invasion from an open wellbore into a fresh water formation. Ecological Engineering and Environmental Technology, 22(4), 53-65. doi: 10.12912/27197050/137868.
  25. Methodology for assigning a surface water body to one of the classes of ecological and chemical states of a surface water body, as well as assigning an artificial or significantly modified surface water body to one of the classes of ecological potential of an artificial or significantly modified surface water body, approved by the order of the Ministry of Nature Protection of Ukraine (2019, January). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/ laws/show/z0127-19#Text.
  26. Odnorih, Z., Manko, R., Malovanyy, M., & Soloviy, K. (2020). Results of surface water quality monitoring of the Western Bug river basin in Lviv region. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 21(3), 18-26. doi: 10.12911/22998993/118303.
  27. Order of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine dated December No. 1134-р “On Approval of the Water Strategy of Ukraine for the Period up to 2050” (2022, December). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/ show/1134-2022-%D1%80#Text.
  28. Order of the Ministry of Environment of Ukraine No. 313 “On Approval of Schedules for the Process of Developing Draft River Basin Management Plans”. (2020, Nowember). Retrieved from https://mepr.gov.ua/ nakaz-mindovkillya-313-vid-27-11-2020/.
  29. Ostapenko, O, Savina, N., Marnatova, L., ZieninaBilichenko, A., & Selezneva, O. (2020). Perspectives of applicayion of innovative resource-saving technologies in the concepts of green logistics and sustainable development. Tourismo: Estudos and Praticas (UERN).
  30. Perschke, M.J., Harris, L.R., Sink, K.J., & Lombard, A.T. (2023). Using ecological infrastructure to comprehensively map ecosystem service demand, flow and capacity for spatial assessment and planning. Ecosystem Services, 62, article number 101536. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2023.101536.
  31. Poikane, S., Zohary, T., & Cantonati, M. (2019). Assessing the ecological effects of hydromorphological pressures on European lakes. Inland Waters, 10(2), 241-255. doi: 10.1080/20442041.2019.1654800.
  32. Prut and Siret River Basin Water Resources Management. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://dpbuvr.gov.ua/.
  33. Prykhodko, M., Arkhypova, L., Fomenko, N., Syrovets, S., Varianichko, V., & Osypov, D. (2023). Economic value of ecosystem services in the landscapes of Ukraine. In 17th International conference monitoring of geological processes and ecological condition of the environment (pp. 1-5). Kyiv: European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers.  doi: 10.3997/2214-4609.2023520221.
  34. Prykhodko, M.M., Romaniuk, V.V., Kukhtar, D.V., Bodnaruk, I.L., & Adamovych, M.V. (2020). Use of geoinformation technology to study the structure and morphometric parameters of river basins. Geoinformatics: Theoretical and Applied Aspects 2020, 2020, article numer 1732. doi: 10.3997/2214-4609.2020geo014.
  35. Report WWF Ukraine. Detection of artificial structures that impede the free flow of rivers. (2024). Rtrieved from https://wwf.ua/en/?12958941/WWF-Ukraine-and-PrutSiret-River-Basin-Management-Authority-started-agreat-river-barrier-research-project.
  36. Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No. 758 “On Approval of the Procedure for State Water Monitoring” (2018, September). Retrieved from https://davr.gov.ua/postanova-kabinetu-ministriv-ukraini-vid19092018--758-pro-zatverdzhennya-poryadku-zdijsnennya-derzhavnogo-monitoringu-vod.
  37. Shanafelt, D.W., Serra-Diaz, J.M., & Bocquého, G. (2023). Measuring uncertainty in ecosystem service correlations as a function of sample size. Ecosystem Services, 63, article number 101546. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2023.101546.
  38. Shumilova, O., Sukhodolov, A. Tockner, K., Khilchevskyi, V., De Meester, L, Stepanenko, S., Trokhymenko, A., Hernandez-Aguero, J.A., & Gleick, P. (2023). Impact of the Russia-Ukraine armed conflict on water resources and water infrastructure. Nature Sustainability, 6, 578-586. doi: 10.1038/s41893-023-01068-x.
  39. Simkiv, L., Shults, S., Lutskiv, O., & Andrusiv, U. (2021). Analysis of the dynamics of structural processes in the context of ensuring sustainable development. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 10(1), 153-167. doi: 10.14207/ejsd.2021.v10n1p153.
  40. Skoulikaris, C., & Zafirakou, A. (2019). River Basin Management Plans as a tool for sustainable transboundary river basins’ management. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(15), 14835-14848. doi:10.1007/ s11356-019-04122-4.
  41. Soule, E., Charbonnier, R., Schlosser, L., Michonneau, P., Michel, N., & Bockstaller, C. (2023). A new method to assess sustainability of agricultural systems by integrating ecosystem services and environmental impacts. Journal of Cleaner Production, 415, article number 137784. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137784.
  42. Stefanidis, K., Naura, M., Kouvarda, T., Latsiou, A., Gritzalis, K., & Dimitriou, E. (2024). Expanding the habitat quality assessment of rivers in Greece using an updated River Habitat Survey toolbox. Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology, 25(2), 455-464. doi 10.1016/j.ecohyd.2024.07.005.
  43. Strokal, V. (2021). Transboundary rivers of Ukraine: Perspectives for sustainable development and clean water. Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences, 18(1), 67-87. doi: 10.1080/1943815X.2021.1930058.
  44. UNENGO “MAMA-86”. (2014). A pressure-impact analysis/risk assessment according to EU WFD: Part 2. Kiev: UNENGO “MAMA-86”.
  45. Vikhryst, S., Mudra, K., Osiyskiy, E., Skobley, M., & Yaroshevich, O. (2018) Methodological recommendations for determining the main anthropogenic loads and their impacts on the state of surface waters. Retrieved from https://davr.gov.ua/fls18/mvod1.pdf.
  46. Wang, J., Su, D., Wu, Q., Li, G., & Cao, Y. (2023). Study on eco-efficiency of cultivated land utilization based on the improvement of ecosystem services and emergy analysis. Science of the Total Environment, 882, article number 163489. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163489.
  47. Zaborowski, S., Kaluza, T., & Jusik, S. (2023). The impact of spontaneous and induced restoration on the hydromorphological conditions and macrophytes, example of Flinta river. Sustainability, 15(5), article number 4302. doi: 10.3390/su15054302.
  48. Zelinska, H., Andrusiv, U., Daliak, N., Dovgal, O., & Lagodiienko, V. (2021). Sustainable development: Trends in Ukraine and the world. Journal of Environmental Management And Tourism, 12(5), 1179-1187. doi: 10.14505// jemt.v12.5(53).03.
Arkhypova, L., Korchemlyuk, M., Rashevska, H., Vynnychenko, I., & Tyshchuk, I. (2025). Practical aspects of environmental assessment of water bodies transformation. Scientific Horizons, 28(5), 65-78. https://doi.org/10.48077/scihor5.2025.65