Organic raspberry cultivation in Lviv region

Vasyl Ovcharuk, Oksana Muliarchuk, Vitalii Stepanchenko, Tetiana Kozina, Tetiana Padalko
Download article Read article

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to establish scientifically based approaches to the use of biological methods of raspberry protection to increase both yield and quality in organic farming. The study investigated the effectiveness of biological means of protecting raspberries from the main pests, specifically aphids (Aphis ruborum), caterpillars, and raspberry beetle (Byturus tomentosus), in the field conditions of Lviv region. Three types of biological agents were used for the experiment: entomophages (ladybugs, trichogramma) and bioinsecticides based on Bacillus thuringiensis. The experimental design included a control group without protection, groups with the use of individual agents, and a combined group where all methods were used simultaneously. The count of pests and the level of fruit damage were analysed on a decadal basis during the growing season, which lasted from May to August. The findings revealed that the combined use of biological agents was the most effective. The use of ladybugs reduced the count of aphids by 85%, trichogramma reduced fruit damage by caterpillars by 90%, while bioinsecticides reduced yield losses caused by raspberry beetles by 60%. In the combined group, the count of pests decreased by up to 98%, while yield losses were reduced to a minimum. The economic analysis confirmed the feasibility of using biological methods: the combined approach increased the profitability of raspberry cultivation by 35% while ensuring that the products met organic farming standards. The findings of the study demonstrated the high efficiency of biological pest control agents, their economic viability, and environmental safety. The findings are of practical significance for organic farming and can be used as recommendations for farmers

Keywords

agriculture; biological products; pests; biological protection; entomophages

[1] Anjos, R., Cosme, F., Gonçalves, A., Nunes, F.M., Vilela, A., & Pinto, T. (2020). Effect of agricultural practices, conventional vs organic, on the phytochemical composition of ‘Kweli’ and ‘Tulameen’ raspberries (Rubus idaeus L.). Food Chemistry, 328, article number 126833. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.126833.

[2] Baker, B.P., Green, T.A., & Loker, A.J. (2019). Biological control and integrated pest management in organic and conventional systems. Biological Control, 140, article number 104095. doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2019.104095.

[3] Balawejder, M., Matłok, N., Piechowiak, T., Szostek, M., Kapusta, I., Niemiec, M., & Kuboń, M. (2022). The modification of substrate in the soilless cultivation of raspberries (Rubus idaeus L.) as a factor stimulating the biosynthesis of selected bioactive compounds in fruits. Molecules, 28(1), article number 118. doi: 10.3390/ molecules28010118.

[4] Basanets, O. (2024). How entomophages work: types, benefits and applications. Retrieved from https:// superagronom.com/articles/723-yak-pratsyuyut-entomofagi-vidi-korist-ta-mojlivosti-zastosuvannya.

[5] Commission Regulation (EC) No. 889/2008 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No. 834/2007 on organic production and labelling of organic products with regard to organic production, labelling and control. (2008). Retrieved from https://surl.li/quwsaz.

[6] Concept of development of a biological method of plant protection. (2023). Retrieved from https://agro.dn.gov.ua/kontseptsiya-rozvytku-biologichnogo-metodu-zahystu-roslyn/.

[7] Convention on Biological Diversity. (1992). Retrieved from https://www.cbd.int/doc/legal/cbd-en.pdf.

[8] Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora. (1973). Retrieved from https://cites.org/eng/disc/text.php.

[9] Drobek, M., Cybulska, J., Zdunek, A., Sas-Paszt, L., & Frąc, M. (2024). Effect of microbial biostimulants on the antioxidant profile, antioxidant capacity and activity of enzymes influencing the quality level of raspberries (Rubus idaeus L.). Food Chemistry, 454, article number 139746. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2024.139746.

[10] Estrada-Beltran, A., Salas-Salazar, N.A., Parra-Quezada, R.A., Gonzalez-Franco, A.C., Soto-Caballero, M.C., Rodriguez-Roque, M.J., Flores-Cordova, M.A., & Chavez-Martinez, A. (2020). Effect of conventional and organic fertilizers on volatile compounds of raspberry fruit. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca, 48(2), 862-870. doi: 10.15835/nbha48211810.

[11] Frías-Moreno, M.N., Parra-Quezada, R.A., González-Aguilar, G., Ruíz-Canizales, J., Molina-Corral, F.J., Sepulveda, D.R., & Olivas, G.I. (2021). Quality, bioactive compounds, antioxidant capacity, and enzymes of raspberries at different maturity stages, effects of organic vs. conventional fertilization. Foods, 10(5), article number 953. doi: 10.3390/foods10050953.

[12] Fuentealba, C., Álvarez, F., Ponce, E., Veas, S., Salazar, M., Romero, D., & Fuentes, L. (2024). Differences in primary metabolism related to quality of raspberry (Rubus idaeus L.) fruit under open field and protected soilless culture growing conditions. Frontiers in Plant Science, 14, article number 1324066. doi: 10.3389/ fpls.2023.1324066.

[13] Hablak, S. (2022). Resource saving in maize protection against scale insect pests. Retrieved from https:// agrobusiness.com.ua/ekonomiia-resursiv?utm_source=chatgpt.com.

[14] Haleeva, A., Hruban, V., Horbunov, M., & Ruzhniak, M. (2024). Improving the process of plant protection mechanisation in grape growing. Ukrainian Black Sea Region Agrarian Science, 28(4), 85-95. doi: 10.56407/ bs.agrarian/4.2024.85.

[15] Ičanović, M., Handanović, S., & Marković, M. (2024). The influence of humus extract on the quality of raspberry (Rubus idaeus L.). Agro-Knowledge Journal, 25(1), 11-19. doi: 10.7251/agren2401011i.

[16] Ilhan, G. (2024). Evaluation of wild raspberry (Rubus idaeus L.) ecotypes from Northeastern Türkiye. doi: 10.20944/ preprints202401.1390.v1.

[17] Ispiryan, A., Giedraitis, A., Sermuksnyte-Alesiuniene, K., Butu, M., Atkociuniene, V., Butu, A., & Miceikiene, A. (2023). Sustainable development solutions: Growing and processing raspberries on Lithuanian farms. Foods, 12(21), article number 3930. doi: 10.3390/foods12213930.

[18] Kotuła, M., Kapusta-Duch, J., Dziadek, M., Nowak, E., Borczak, B., & Dziadek, K. (2024). Impact of package type on selected health quality parameters of organic, conventional and wild raspberries (Rubus idaeus L.) frozen stored. Applied Sciences, 14(17), article number 7622. doi: 10.3390/app14177622.

[19] Kotuła, M., Kapusta-Duch, J., Smoleń, S., & Doskočil, I. (2022). Phytochemical composition of the fruits and leaves of raspberries (Rubus idaeus L.) – conventional vs. organic and those wild grown. Applied Sciences, 12(22), article number 11783. doi: 10.3390/app122211783.

[20] Kuboń, M., Matłok, N., Szostek, M., Wróbel, M., Mudryk, K., Sikora, J., Marczuk, A., Saletnik, B., & Balawejder, M. (2024). Modification of coconut fibers through impregnation with eco-friendly wood based isolate as a method to increase the sustainability of dessert raspberries production. Sustainability, 16(14), article number 5878. doi: 10.3390/su16145878.

[21] Lee, K., McDermott, S., & Fernandez, L. (2024). Using economics to inform and evaluate biological control programs: Opportunities, challenges, and recommendations for future research. BioControl, 69(3), 237-252. doi: 10.1007/s10526-024-10244-7.

[22] Maharramova, S. (2023). Changes in the chemical composition of extracts of wild berries growing in the Republic of Azerbaijan due to enzimatic pretreatment of their pulp. Ukrainian Food Journal, 12(4), 542-555. doi: 10.24263/2304-974X-2023-12-4-5.

[23] Medvid, Y. (2021). Coccinellids on clover and alfalfa, their value in population control of aphids. Taurian Scientific Herald, 120, 94-99. doi: 10.32851/2226-0099.2021.120.13.

[24] Milinković, M., Vranić, D., Đurić, M., & Paunović, S. (2021). Chemical composition of organically and conventionally grown fruits of raspberry (Rubus idaeus L.) cv. Willamette. Acta Agriculturae Serbica, 26(51), 83-88. doi: 10.5937/ aaser2151083m.

[25] Murtić, S., Fazlić, J., Šerbo, A., Valjevac, M., Muharemović, I., & Topčić, F. (2022). Yield and fruit quality of “Meeker” raspberry from conventional and organic cultivation systems. Acta Agriculturae Serbica, 27(54), 143148. doi: 10.5937/aaser2254143m.

[26] Podedworny, G., Tartanus, M., & Malusà, E. (2024). Effect of different practices enhancing biodiversity on pest and beneficial organism populations in organic strawberry and raspberry production. In Proceedings of the 21st international conference on organic fruit-growing (pp. 159-162). Filderstadt: Fördergemeinschaft Ökologischer Obstbau.

[27] Ponder, A., & Hallmann, E. (2020). The nutritional value and vitamin C content of different raspberry cultivars from organic and conventional production. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 87, article number 103429. doi: 10.1016/j.jfca.2020.103429.

[28] Popa, R., Șchiopu, E.C., Pătrașcu, A., Bălăcescu, A., & Toader, F.A. (2024). Raspberry production opportunity to develop an agricultural business in the context of the circular economy: Case study in South-West Romania. Agriculture, 14(10), article number 1822. doi: 10.3390/agriculture14101822.

[29] Regulation 2007/834 - Organic production and labelling of organic products. (2007). Retrieved from https:// www.eumonitor.eu/9353000/1/j9vvik7m1c3gyxp/vitgbgime8jl#:~:text=The%20Community%20legal%20 framework%20governing,in%20products%20labelled%20as%20organic.

[30] Sangiorgio, D., Cellini, A., Spinelli, F., Farneti, B., Khomenko, I., Muzzi, E., & Donati, I. (2021). Does organic farming increase raspberry quality, aroma and beneficial bacterial biodiversity? Microorganisms, 9(8), article number 1617. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9081617.

[31] Shabliy, O.I., Mukha, B.P., Gurin, A.V., & Zinkevich, M.V. (2025). Vegetation of the Lviv region. Forests of the Lviv region. Retrieved from https://geoknigi.com/book_view.php?id=32.

[32] Shahini, S., Mustafaj, S., Sula, U., Shahini, E., Skura, E., & Sallaku, F. (2023). Biological control of greenhouse whitefly Trialeurodes vaporariorum with Encarsia formosa: Special CASE DEVELOPEd in Albania. Evergreen,10(4), 2084-2091. doi: 10.5109/7160868.

[33] Shahini, S., Skura, E., Huqi, A., Shahini, E., Ramadhi, A., & Sallaku, F. (2024). Integrated management of the mediterranean fruit fly (Ceratitis capitata) on citrus in the Konispol, Albania. Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources, 7(2), 324-346. doi: 10.33002/nr2581.6853.070217.

[34] Sykalo, O., & Shpak, B. (2024). Study and assessment of the of the Taegro WP application on strawberries biological effectiveness in the conditions of the agricultural sector and private farms. Biological Systems: Theory and Innovation, 15(2), 76-83. doi: 10.31548/biologiya15(2).2024.007.

[35] Tanchyk, S., Pavlov, O., & Babenko, A. (2024). Theoretical substantiation and development of ecologically friendly farming system in Ukraine. Plant and Soil Science, 15(2), 55-66. doi: 10.31548/plant2.2024.55.

[36] Tkalenko, H. (2022). Biological method of plant protection in Ukraine: Realities and prospects. Retrieved from https://agro-business.com.ua/agro/ahronomiia-sohodni/item/25041-biolohichnyi-metod-zakhystu-roslyn-vukraini-realii-i-perspektyvy.html.

[37] Todosiychuk, V. (2024). Natural control of spider mites: The use of ladybugs in organic gardens. Retrieved from https://biofield.com.ua/uk/statti/pryrodnyy-kontrol-pavutynnykh-klishchiv-vykorystannya-sonechokorhanichnykh-sadakh_1026?utm_source=chatgpt.com.

[38] Vasyliev, O.O. (2021). Trichogram: ‘Pitfalls of application. Retrieved from https://www.agronom.com.ua/ tryhograma-dvodni-kameni-zastosuvannya/.

[39] Velicevici, G., Ciulca, A., Ciulca, S., Camen, D., Moatăr, M., Mălăescu, M., Beinsan, C., & Tulcan, C. (2024). Evaluation of some characteristics of raspberry cultivars grown in Timiș county. Journal of Horticulture, Forestry and Biotechnology, 28(2), 60-63.

Ovcharuk, V., Muliarchuk, O., Stepanchenko, V., Kozina, T., & Padalko, T. (2025). Organic raspberry cultivation in Lviv region. Scientific Horizons, 28(2), 43-54. https://doi.org/10.48077/scihor2.2025.43