The role of microbial enzymes β-glucanase and α-amylase in optimising feed production for poultry
Abstract
With the increase in world population and higher consumption of poultry meat, the need for efficient feed production to ensure high quality and quantity of products is increasing. The main objective of the study was to find out the effect of microbial enzymes β-glucanase and α-amylase on optimising the performance of poultry feed. The method of analysis, one-way analysis of variance, chemical analysis and quantitative analysis were used in the study. A review of the work showed that enzyme analysis in the experimental feeds confirmed the determined concentrations of 44, 67 and 88 kN. The treatments significantly reduced body weight gain and feed conversion ratio throughout the evaluation period. The effect was particularly marked at K-110 kcal/kg and enzyme concentrations of 250, 350 and 450 mg/kg. Enzyme supplementation resulted in partial recovery of performance evident at various intervals including 10-17 days, 17-30 days, and 30-37 days. The enzyme supplemented groups showed positive results in body weight gain, especially at K-110 kcal/kg and enzyme concentrations of 250, 350 and 450 mg/kg, compared to the control group. The results emphasised not only the high precision of the study, but also the effectiveness of the enzymes in improving feed utilisation and maintaining bird performance under altered dietary conditions. The study of enzyme complex in feeds is of practical importance to the poultry industry, as it confirms the efficacy of enzyme supplementation in improving feed utilisation and maintaining bird performance under altered diets. The findings provided a basis for optimising diets using specific energy levels and enzyme concentrations, which can lead to improved body weight gain and FCR, promoting more efficient nutrient uptake and reducing productivity losses in birds
Keywords
diet; active additives; broilers; productivity; body weight gain; feed conversion ratio
[1] Abylgazinova, A.T., Orazov, A.Zh., Stathopoulos, C., Nugmanov, K.S., & Zaidullina, A.S. (2023). Assessment of quality and safety indicators of poultry carcasses produced at the enterprises of the West Kazakhstan region. Science and Education. Animal Husbandry, 71(2), 17-24. doi: 10.52578/2305-9397-2023-2-17-24.
[2] Alimkulo, Z., Velyamov, M., Potoroko, I., Kuanysh, S., Zhumaliyeva, T., & Shauliyeva, K. (2022). Development of resource-saving biotechnology for the production of a feed additive from distiller’s wastes with probiotic properties. Archives of Razi Institute, 77(6), 2281-2289. doi: 10.22092/ARI.2022.360053.2536.
[3] Bakare, A.G., Zindove, T.J., Iji, P.A., Stamatopoulos, K., & Cowieson, A.J. (2021). A review of limitations to using cassava meal in poultry diets and the potential role of exogenous microbial enzymes. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 53, article number 426. doi: 10.1007/s11250-021-02853-6.
[4] Bornaei, L., Salari, S., & Erfani Majd, N. (2022). Effect of electron beam irradiated barley grains on growth performance, blood parameters, nutrient digestibility, microbial population, and intestinal histomorphometry in broiler chickens. Journal of Applied Animal Research, 50(1), 408-419. doi: 10.1080/09712119.2022.2089151.
[5] Boukid, F., Ganeshan, S., Wang, Y., Tülbek, M.Ç., & Nickerson, M.T. (2023). Bioengineered enzymes and precision fermentation in the food industry. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24(12), article number 10156. doi: 10.3390/ijms241210156.
[6] Chauhan, J., Shukla, R., Bishoyi, A.K., Goyal, S., & Sanghvi, G. (2023). Investigation of physical, nutritional and sensory properties of wheat bread treated with purified thermostable cellulase and alpha amylase. Cogent Food & Agriculture, 9(1), article number 2261839. doi: 10.1080/23311932.2023.2261839.
[7] Daneshmand, A., Kumar, A., Kheravii, S.K., Pasquali, G.A.M., & Wu, S.B. (2023). Xylanase and beta-glucanase improve performance parameters and footpad dermatitis and modulate intestinal microbiota in broilers under an Eimeria challenge. Poultry Science, 102(11), article number 103055. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2023.103055.
[8] Daskalova, A., Kucheruk, K., Zasekin, D., & Hryb, J. (2023). Effect of probiotic drugs and their metabolites on the microflora of digestive canal of broiler chickens. Ukrainian Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 14(3), 46-64. doi: 10.31548/veterinary3.2023.46.
[9] European Convention for the Protection of Pet Animals. (1987). Retrieved from https://www.coe.int/en/web/ conventions/full-list?module=treaty-detail&treatynum=125.
[10] Gulizia, J.P., Bonilla, S.M., Vargas, J.I., Sasia, S.J., Llamas-Moya, S., Duong, T., & Pacheco, W.J. (2023). The effects of phytase and a multicarbohydrase complex containing α-galactosidase on performance, processing yield, and nutrient digestibility in the broiler chicken. Journal of Applied Animal Research, 51(1), 308-322. doi: 10.1080/09712119.2023.2197975.
[11] Hasan, M.T., Kim, H.J., Hur, S.W., Jeong, S.M., Kim, K.W., & Lee, S. (2023). Dietary exogenous α-amylase modulates the nutrient digestibility, digestive enzyme activity, growth-related gene expression, and diet degradation rate of olive flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus). Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 33(10), 1390-1401. doi: 10.4014/jmb.2303.03033.
[12] Kurmanbayeva, M., Makhatov, Zh., Kusmangazinov, A., Karabalayeva, D., & Yerezhepova, N. (2023). Protein, amino acid and carbohydrate content of fungal treated annual and perennial wheat straw. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 24(12), 235-246. doi: 10.12911/22998993/173065.
[13] Liu, C.L., Shih, Y.R., Tang, P.C., Lin, L.J., & Lee, T.T. (2022). Effects of dietary supplementation with Bacillus spp. and Debaryomyces spp. on broiler’s growth performance, serum characteristics, intestinal microflora and antioxidant activity. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 21(1), 717-728. doi: 10.1080/1828051X.2022.2059022.
[14] Mendybayeva, A., Abilova, Z., Bulashev, A., & Rychshanova, R. (2023). Prevalence and resistance to antibacterial agents in Salmonella enterica strains isolated from poultry products in Northern Kazakhstan. Veterinary World, 16(3), 657-667. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2023.657-667.
[15] Mogilev, K., Yeleusizova, A., Aisin, M., & Dyusembekov, S. (2023). Evaluation of sanitary and hygienic characteristics of chicken meat and semi-finished products. Ġylym ŽaNe Bìlìm, ̋ 1(70), 27-34. doi: 10.52578/23059397-2023-1-1-27-34.
[16] Montayeva, N.S., Montayev, S.A., & Montayeva, A.S. (2023). Studies of Montmorillonitic (Bentonite) clay of Western Kazakhstan as a therapeutic mineral feed additive for animals and poultry. Agricultural Research, 12(2), 226-231. doi: 10.1007/s40003-022-00634-7.
[17] Moran Jr. E.T., & Bedford, M.R. (2022). Large intestinal dynamics differ between fowl and swine: Anatomical modifications, microbial collaboration, and digestive advantages from fibrolytic enzymes. Animal Nutrition, 11, 160-170. doi: 10.1016/j.aninu.2022.07.004.
[18] Morgan, N.K., Gomes, G.A., & Kim, J.C. (2021). Comparing the efficacy of stimbiotic and a combination of xylanase and beta-glucanase, in broilers fed wheat-barley based diets with high or low AME. Poultry Science, 100(10), article number 101383. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2021.101383.
[19] Muminova, S.S., Bayadilova, G., Mukhametzhanova, O., Seilgazina, S.M., Zhumabayeva, R. & Rvaidarova, G. (2023). The effects of feeding with organic waste by the terrestrial isopod Philoscia Muscorum on enzyme activities in an incubated soil. Eurasian Journal of Soil Science, 12(2), 122-126. doi: 10.18393/ejss.1211180.
[20] Nanda, A., Mahapatra, A., Mohapatra, B.B., & Mahapatra, A.P.K. (2021). Multiple comparison test by Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD): Does the confidence level control type I error. International Journal of Statistics and Applied Mathematics, 6(1), 59-65. doi: 10.22271/maths.2021.v6.i1a.636.
[21] Nascimento, A.A., de Macêdo, É.S., Gonçalves, G.S., da Cruz, T.P., Wernick, B., Furuya, V.R.B., & Furuya, W.M. (2023). Xylanase and β-glucanase in tandem improve performance, digestive enzymes activity and digestibility in juvenile Nile tilapia fed corn distillers’ dried grains with solubles-added diet. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 306, article number 115816. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2023.115816.
[22] Rashidova, N.T., & Fayziyeva, A. (2023). Obtaining biotechnological products on the basis of enzymatic conversion of plant waste and prospects for their use. Academia Science Repository, 4(4), 685-696.
[23] Rupolo, P.E., Monteiro, D.P., Ribeiro, T.P., de Azevedo, L.B., Gregory, C.R., Careli, P.S., Carvalho, S.T., Paiano, D., Hannas, M.I., Nunes, R.V., da Silva, M.A.A., Genova, J.L., & de Carvalho, P.L.O. (2023). Effects of supplementation of α-amylase alone in a model of growing and finishing pigs fed metabolizable energy-reduced diets. Livestock Science, 278, article number 105361. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2023.10536.
[24] Saken, A.K., Fatkullin, R.R., Mustafin, M.K., & Daribaeva, S.A. (2021). Biochemical features of the influence of distribution and accumulation of heavy metals in the system “soil – plant food – poultry droppings” on the organism of broilers. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 723, article number 032025. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/723/3/032025.
[25] Shalginbaeyv, D., Uazhanova, R., & Mateyeva, A. (2022). Development of a laboratory method for determination of the quality and freshness of frozen poultry meat. Potravinarstvo Slovak Journal of Food Sciences, 16, 271-278. doi: 10.5219/1757.
[26] Smits, C.H.M., Li, D., Patience, J.F., & den Hartog, L.A. (2021). Animal nutrition strategies and options to reduce the use of antimicrobials in animal production. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
[27] Sychov, M., Umanets, D., Balanchuk, I., Umanets, R., Ilchuk, I., & Holubieva, T. (2024). Effect of feeding Artemisia capillaris on egg production and egg quality in quail. Animal Science and Food Technology, 15(1), 105-120. doi: 10.31548/animal.1.2024.105.
[28] Szeląg-Sikora, A., Oleksy-Gębczyk, A., Kowalska-Jarnot, K., Sikora, J., & Stuglik, J. (2024). Development of poultry meat production and consumption levels in the light of environmental sustainability goals. In Farm machinery and processes management in sustainable agriculture (pp. 411-418). Cham: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-03170955-5_45.
[29] Temirbekova, A., Tekebayeva, Zh., Temirkhanov, A., Yevneyeva, D., Sadykov, A., Meiramkulova, K., Mkilima, T., & Abzhalelov, A. (2023). Isolation and characterization of bacteria with high electroactive potential from poultry wastewater. Biology, 12(4), article number 623. doi: 10.3390/biology12040623.
[30] Turmagambetova, A.S., Sokolova, N.S., Bogoyavlenskiy, A.P., Berezin, V.E., Lila, M.A., Cheng, D.M., & Dushenkov, V. (2015). New functionally-enhanced soy proteins as food ingredients with anti-viral activity. VirusDisease, 26(3), 123-132. doi: 10.1007/s13337-015-0268-6.
[31] Universal Declaration on Animal Welfare. (2007). Retrieved from http://surl.li/pkuwkg.
[32] Voronetska, I., & Yurchuk, N. (2023). Fodder production in Ukraine: Trends, problems and prospects. Ukrainian Black Sea Region Agrarian Science, 27(2), 51-62. doi: 10.56407/bs.agrarian/2.2023.51.
[33] Yadav, S., & Jha, R. (2019). Strategies to modulate the intestinal microbiota and their effects on nutrient utilisation, performance, and health of poultry. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, 10, article number 2. doi: 10.1186/s40104-018-0310-9.