The impact of trade policy on the export of agricultural products of Azerbaijan
Abstract
The study presented a comprehensive analysis of the factors affecting the competitiveness of agricultural products in Azerbaijan, with an emphasis on assessing the role of trade policy and government support. The main focus was on the impact of trade agreements, tariff and non-tariff barriers, and subsidy programmes on export volumes. Using the methods of statistical and comparative analysis, the main determinants affecting the export of agricultural products were identified and their importance is assessed. The purpose of the study was to develop effective measures and strategies to improve the export potential and increase the competitiveness of Azerbaijan’s agricultural sector in international markets through the analysis of key factors and the impact of trade policy. The results of the study showed that Azerbaijan’s participation in international trade agreements has a positive impact on export performance. The conclusion of bilateral agreements with key trading partners such as the EU, Turkey, and Iran contributed to the reduction of trade barriers and the opening of new markets. This highlighted the importance of the country's continued active participation in global trade initiatives. The analysis also confirmed the substantial impact of government subsidies on the competitiveness of products. Targeted subsidies helped to reduce the cost of production and improve quality, which is especially important in the context of international competition. Measures were proposed to optimise subsidy programmes and improve efficiency. Special attention is paid to the role of tariff and non-tariff barriers, which remain a considerable obstacle to exports. The study showed that high tariffs and strict non-tariff requirements substantially limit export potential. In this regard, it is recommended to continue the unification of standards with international requirements and simplify certification procedures. The results of the study emphasised the need to modernise the agricultural sector and introduce innovations. The introduction of modern technologies and the improvement of logistics infrastructure contributed to an increase in export volumes and strengthen positions in international markets. Thus, the study identified the main factors affecting the export of agricultural products of Azerbaijan and proposes specific measures to improve trade policy and increase the competitiveness of products in international markets
Keywords
industry development; non-tariff restrictions; economic development; government regulation; international cooperation
[1] Abdullayev, K., Abdullayev, R., Yusifov, E., Babazade, I., & Fataliyeva, G. (2024). Main areas of development of the digital economy in the Republic of Azerbaijan. Economics of Development, 23(1), 78-88. doi: 10.57111/ econ/1.2024.78.
[2] Arisoy, H. (2020). Impact of agricultural supports on competitiveness of agricultural products. Agricultural Economics, 66(6), 286-295. doi: 10.17221/416/2019-AGRICECON.
[3] Balogh, J.M., & Jámbor, A. (2020). The environmental impacts of agricultural trade: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 12(3), article number 1152. doi: 10.3390/su12031152.
[4] Bayramov, S.V., Mehdiyeva, G.Y., Eyvazov, A.A., & Mustafayev, E.R. (2021). Diversification rate of energy balance and energy export demand risk impacts on economic growth: The case of Azerbaijan. Cuestiones Políticas, 39(68), 290-314. doi: 10.46398/cuestpol.3968.18.
[5] Chornyi, R.S. (2013). Labor potential of urban settlements: Features of forming and development. Economic Annals-XXI, 1-2(1), 41-44.
[6] Cipollina, M., & Salvatici, L. (2020). On the effects of EU trade policy: Agricultural tariffs still matter. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 47(4), 1367-1401. doi: 10.1093/erae/jbz053.
[7] Das, G., Ginting, E., Hampel, A., & Horridge, M. (2022). Key binding constraints, structural reform, and growth potential of Azerbaijan via economic diversification: A computable general equilibrium policy impact analysis. Journal of Eurasian Studies, 13(2), 119-144. doi: 10.1177/18793665221096688.
[8] Decree of the President of the Republic of Azerbaijan No. 759 “About the Creation of a New Subsidy Mechanism in the Agricultural Field”. (2019). Retrieved from https://e-qanun.az/framework/42750.
[9] Erduman, Y., Eren, O., & Gül, S. (2020). Import content of Turkish production and exports: A sectoral analysis. Central Bank Review, 20(4), 155-168. doi: 10.1016/j.cbrev.2020.07.001.
[10] Eurostat. (n.d.). Agriculture facts. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/cache/visualisations/ agriculturefacts/#.
[11] Fiankor, D.D., Curzi, D., & Olper, A. (2021). Trade, price and quality upgrading effects of agri-food standards. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 48(4), 835-877. doi: 10.1093/erae/jbaa026.
[12] Food and Agriculture Organization. (2023). Retrieved from https://www.fao.org/turkiye/news/detail-news/ en/c/1629135/.
[13] Fusacchia, I., Balié, J., & Salvatici, L. (2022). The AfCFTA impact on agricultural and food trade: A value added perspective. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 49(1), 237-284. doi: 10.1093/erae/jbab046.
[14] Guliyeva, S. (2023). Energy consumption, economic growth and CO2 emissions in Azerbaijan. Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 5(4), article number e2023052. doi: 10.31893/multiscience.2023052.
[15] Gurbuz, I. B., Nesirov, E., & Ozkan, G. (2021). Does agricultural value-added induce environmental degradation? Evidence from Azerbaijan. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 23099-23112. doi: 10.1007/ s11356-020-12228-3.
[16] Hejazi, M., Grant, J.H., & Peterson, E. (2022). Trade impact of maximum residue limits in fresh fruits and vegetables. Food Policy, 106, article number 102203. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2021.102203.
[17] Humbatova, S.I., Malik, M.M., Valiyev, J.K., & Hajiev, N.G. (2022). Impact of oil exports on imports of food and agricultural products. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 12(3), 135-150. doi: 10.32479/ ijeep.12878.
[18] International Monetary Fund. (2024). Republic of Azerbaijan: 2023 Article IV consultation-press release; and staff report. Retrieved from https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/CR/Issues/2024/02/07/Republic-of-Azerbaijan2023-Article-IV-Consultation-Press-Release-and-Staff-Report-544481.
[19] Işik, S., & Özbuğday, F.C. (2021). The impact of agricultural input costs on food prices in Turkey: A case study. Agricultural Economics, 67(3), 101-110. doi: 10.17221/260/2020-AGRICECON.
[20] Ismayilzada, M., Gahramanova, S., Rahimova, K., & Karimova, V. (2023). Adaptation strategies of agriculture to climate change and natural disasters. Ekonomika APK, 30(6), 17-25. doi: 10.32317/2221-1055.202306017.
[21] Jafarov, S., Imrani, Z., & Eminov, Z. (2024). The current state of foreign trade relations of the Republic of Azerbaijan. South Florida Journal of Development, 5(7), e4194-e4194. doi: 10.46932/sfjdv5n7-034.
[22] Karabulut, Ş. (2020). The impact of imports on exports of Turkey. Journal of Management and Economics Research, 18(1), 76-90. doi: 10.11611/yead.607439.
[23] Leshchenko, K. (2023). Challenges of implementing the EU’s economic initiatives for the Global South. Scientific Bulletin of Mukachevo State University. Series “Economics”, 10(3), 49-57. doi: 10.52566/msu-econ3.2023.49.
[24] Maharramova, S., & Maharramov, M. (2023). Use of Azerbaijan-grown berries to improve nutritional value and reduce toxic metals in soft drinks (including energy drinks). Innovaciencia, 11(1), 1-14. doi: 10.15649/2346075X.3538.
[25] Mamardashvili, P., Gelashvili, S., Katsia, I., & Deisadze, S. (2020). International diversification of agricultural trade of Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia. Caucasus Analytical Digest, 117, 3-21. doi: 10.3929/ethz-b-000442947.
[26] Mamedov, Z.F., & Bayramova, K. (2021). Participation of Azerbaijan in the WTO: Problems and prospects. Proceedings of the 68th international scientific conference on economic and social development (pp. 104-109). Aveiro: University of Aveiro.
[27] Mammadli, M. (2020). Prospects for the export of agricultural products in Azerbaijan. In Proceedings of the 55th international scientific conference on economic and social development (pp. 496-505). Baku: Azerbaijan State University of Economics.
[28] Mizik, T., Gál, P., & Török, Á. (2020). Does agricultural trade competitiveness matter? The case of the CIS countries. AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, 12(1), 61-72. doi: 10.7160/aol.2020.120106.
[29] Niftiyev, I. (2020a). Determinants of the agricultural exports in Azerbaijan. Baku: Univesity of Szeged. doi: 10.2139/ ssrn.3686701.
[30] Niftiyev, I. (2020b). The role of agriculture and agrarian sectors in the Azerbaijan economy: Main trends and dynamics since 1991. Retrieved from https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/226348/1/Working-paperAgriculture-and-Agrarian-Sectors.pdf.
[31] Promotion Agency of the Republic of Azerbaijan. (2021). Strategy for the promotion of foreign direct investments for 2021-2025. Retrieved from https://azpromo.az/az/page/layiheler/bxi-strategiyasi.
[32] Siregar, A.P., & Widjanarko, N.P. (2022). The impact of trade openness on economic growth: Evidence from agricultural countries. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 9(3), 23-31. doi: 10.13106/ jafeb.2022.vol9.no3.0023.
[33] State Statistical Committee of the Republic of Azerbaijan. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.azstat.gov.az/ portal/tblInfo/TblInfoList.do;JSESSIONID=BFEDE4C7FDC0E1ED3C3FEECDB2768A07#.
[34] Sun, T.-T., Su, C.-W., Mirza, N., & Umar, M. (2021). How does trade policy uncertainty affect agriculture commodity prices? Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 66, article number 101514. doi: 10.1016/j.pacfin.2021.101514.
[35] Topuz, S.G., & Dağdemir, Ö. (2020). Analysis of the relationship between trade openness, structural change, and income inequality under Kuznets curve hypothesis: The case of Turkey. Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 29(6), 647-664. doi: 10.1080/09638199.2019.1711146.
[36] Wood, R., Neuhoff, K., Moran, D., Simas, M., Grubb, M., & Stadler, K. (2020). The structure, drivers and policy implications of the European carbon footprint. Climate Policy, 20, 39-57. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2019.1639489.
[37] World Bank. (2022). Azerbaijan can accelerate its green economic transformation: A world bank report shows how. Retrieved from https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2022/12/08/azerbaijan-can-accelerateits-green-economic-transformation-a-world-bank-report-shows-how.
[38] World Trade Organization. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/acc_e/a1_azerbaidjan_e.htm#status.