Patterns and growth dynamics of the plantation sector in South Sumatra, Indonesia

Budi Utomo*, Mega Kusuma Putri, Maharani Oktavia

budiutomo@univpgri-palembang.ac.id

Received: 12.06.2026 Revised: 03.09.2026 Accepted: 23.09.2026 Published: 02.10.2026
Retrieved from Vol. 29, No. 3, 2026 Pages: 54-65
Download article Read article

Abstract

The plantation sector is a crucial pillar of South Sumatra Province’s economic structure, as it contributes significantly to the Gross Regional Domestic Product. Therefore, an in-depth study of its growth dynamics and shifts in regional structure is necessary. This study aimed to identify production characteristics, area, commodity growth, and changes in the plantation sectoral structure across regencies/cities in South Sumatra. Using secondary data from Central Statistics Indonesia  and the Plantation Office for 2021-2025, this study applied quantitative descriptive methods through percentage analysis, growth analysis, and a shift-share approach to examine the competitive position of each plantation commodity. The analysis showed that palm oil, rubber, and coffee are the dominant commodities in both production and spatial distribution, while coconut and cocoa make more limited contributions. The growth analysis for 2021-2025 indicated that coconut (0.025) and coffee (0.023) recorded positive growth, while palm oil (-0.019), rubber (-0.053), and cocoa (-0.021) experienced negative growth. Shift-share analysis further revealed that palm oil (Cij = 2,161,960.89), rubber (Cij = 374,948.27), and cocoa (Cij = 337.51) possessed positive regional competitive advantages, whereas coconut (Cij = -249.30) and coffee (Cij = -6,770.39) exhibited negative competitive values and remained concentrated in limited production areas. These findings indicate a dualistic plantation structure in South Sumatra, where a limited number of commodities function as regional growth drivers while others remain stagnant and require revitalisation. The results provide an empirical basis for local governments to strengthen leading commodities, improve plantation productivity, and formulate differentiated commodity development policies according to regional potential and competitiveness. These findings provide a strategic basis for local governments to strengthen the development of leading commodities, increase area productivity, and design differentiated policies according to the potential and dynamics of each district

Keywords

leading potential; structural transformation; shift-share; Gross Regional Domestic Product; plantation structure; plantation productivity; commodity development

  1. Akbar, A., Flacke, J., Martinez, J., & van Maarseveen, M.F.A.M. (2020). Participatory planning practice in rural Indonesia: A sustainable development goals-based evaluation. Community Development, 51(3), 243-260. doi: 10.1080/15575330.2020.1765822.
  2. Ali, M.F., Akber, M.A., Smith, C., & Aziz, A.A. (2021). The dynamics of rubber production in Malaysia: Potential impacts, challenges, and proposed interventions. Forest Policy and Economics, 127, article number 102449. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102449.
  3. Barbier, E.B. (2004). Agricultural expansion, resource booms and growth in Latin America: Implications for long-run economic development. World Development, 32(1), 137-157. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2003.07.005.
  4. Barkah, J., & Rojali, M. (2024). The impact of oil palm plantations on economic growth in Kalimantan and its effect on poverty. Jurnal Impresi Indonesia, 3(12), 916-923. doi: 10.58344/jii.v3i12.5730.
  5. Barrett, C.B., Christiaensen, L., Sheahan, M., & Shimeles, A. (2017). On the structural transformation of rural Africa. Journal of African Economies, 26(1), 11-35. doi: 10.1093/jae/ejx009.
  6. Brooks, W., Donovan, K., & Johnson, T.R. (2020). Is there a cost-effective means of training microenterprises? The World Bank Economic Review, 34(1), 63-67. doi: 10.1093/wber/lhz031.
  7. Carlson, K.M., Heilmayr, R., Gibbs, H.K., Noojipady, P., Burns, D.N., Morton, D.C., Walker, N.F., Paoli, G.D., & Kremen, C. (2018). Effect of oil palm sustainability certification on deforestation and fire in Indonesia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(1), 121-126. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1704728114.
  8. Chetty, R., & Hendren, N. (2018). The impacts of neighborhoods on intergenerational mobility II: County-level estimates. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 133(3), 1163-1228. doi: 10.1093/qje/qjy006.
  9. Ciptawaty, U., Aida, N., & Pratama, A.D. (2020). Analysis of economic potential and base sectors of seven provinces in Sumatra. Journal of Indonesian Applied Economics, 8(1), 8-12. doi: 10.21776/ub.jiae.2020.008.01.2.
  10. CSA South Sumatra. (2025). Gross regional domestic product of Sumatera Selatan province by industry 2020-2024. Retrieved from https://sumsel.bps.go.id.
  11. Feninda, T. (2023). Analysis of the impact of oil palm plantations on the community economy in South Sumatra province 2011-2020. Co-Value: Jurnal Ekonomi Koperasi & Kewirausahaan, 14(3), 238-254.
  12. Firsta, N.C., Mentari, R.D., Salafiah, E.S., & Estiasih, T. (2020). Preparation of unsaponifiable fraction from crude palm oil: A short review. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 475(1), article number 012032. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/475/1/01203.
  13. Hayashi, K., Oita, A., & Nishina, K. (2020). Concealed nitrogen footprint in protein-free foods: an empirical example using oil palm products. Environmental Research Letters, 15(3), article number 035006. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab68ea.
  14. Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Indonesia. (2025). Regional fiscal study of south Sumatra Province (Vol. 8). Retrieved from https://djpb.kemenkeu.go.id/kanwil/sumsel/id/.
  15. Masitah, T.H., Setiawan, M., Indiastuti, R., & Wardhana, A. (2023). Determinants of the palm oil industry productivity in Indonesia. Cogent Economics & Finance, 11(1), article number 2154002. doi: 10.1080/23322039.2022.2154002.
  16. Mauladi, M.A.R., Mulyo, J.H., & Darwanto, D.H. (2022). Coffee supply chain management: A case study in Ciamis, West Java, Indonesia. Habitat, 33(3), 201-211. doi: 10.21776/ub.habitat.2022.033.3.20.
  17. Merfeld, J.D., & Brummund, P. (2022). The importance of specification choices when analyzing sectoral productivity gaps. Agricultural Economics, 53(4), 605-616. doi: 10.1111/agec.12692.
  18. Muchane, M.N., Sileshi, G.W., Gripenberg, S., Jonsson, M., Pumariño, L., & Barrios, E. (2020). Agroforestry boosts soil health in the humid and sub-humid tropics: A meta-analysis. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 295, article number 106899. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2020.106899.
  19. Mulyo, J.H., Suryantini, A., Masyhuri, M., & Imelda, I. (2023). Understanding farmers’ risk perception and attitude: A case study of rubber farming in West Kalimantan, Indonesia. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 8(1), 164-186. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2023009.
  20. South Sumatra Province. (2019). Medium-term regional development plan of South Sumatra Province 2019-2023. Retrieved from https://jdih.sumselprov.go.id/produk-hukum-detail/7357.
  21. Reisman, E. (2022). Protecting provenance, abandoning agriculture? Heritage products, industrial ideals, and the uprooting of a Spanish turrón. Journal of Rural Studies, 89, 45-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.11.003.
  22. Syahza, A., Bakce, D., Irianti, M., Asmit, B., & Nasrul, B. (2021). Development of superior plantation commodities based on sustainable development. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 16(4), 683-692. doi: 10.18280/ijsdp.160408.
  23. Toffolini, Q., et al. (2020). Design as a source of renewal in the production of scientific knowledge in crop science. Agricultural Systems, 185, article number 102939. doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102939.
  24. Wang, P., McCarthy, B., & Kapetanaki, A.B. (2021). To be ethical or to be good? The impact of “Good Provider” and moral norms on food waste decisions in two countries. Global Environmental Change, 69, article number 102300. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102300.
  25. Yeung, H.W., & Coe, N.M. (2015). Toward a dynamic theory of global production networks. Economic Geography, 91(1), 29-58. doi: 10.1111/ecge.12063.
Utomo, B., Putri, M.K., & Oktavia, M. (2026). Patterns and growth dynamics of the plantation sector in South Sumatra, Indonesia. Scientific Horizons, 29(3), 54-65. https://doi.org/10.48077/scihor3.2026.54